2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.555515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>AdaptSAPS utility for adaptive ATR development and assessment</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These compare favourably with the results from[8], which give average mission results for Mission 6 of D = 0.577, E = 0.224, and MOP-A = 0.324 (the Pcc metric is not given).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These compare favourably with the results from[8], which give average mission results for Mission 6 of D = 0.577, E = 0.224, and MOP-A = 0.324 (the Pcc metric is not given).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this way, it is possible to examine the degree of improvement and adaptation that the system undergoes over the course of a mission. The mission results at [8] provide an indication of a baseline level of performance for a simple system that discriminates between target and non-target vehicles. For 'Mission 6', the Discrimination metric D was 0.577, the reported accuracy E was 0.224, and the MOP-A metric was 0.324.…”
Section: Previous Adaptsaps Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations