1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.281065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Adaptive automatic terrain extraction</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Leica/Helava DPW, Automated Terrain Extraction (AATE), cross‐correlation (Miller and De Venecia, 1992; Zhang and Miller, 1997); Zeiss PHODIS ST, Topo SURF (MATCH‐T), feature based; Intergraph ImageStation, MATCH‐T, feature based (Krzystek, 1995); PCI Geomatics, DEM extraction; SOCET SET, BAE Systems digital DTM generation; and VirtuoZo, cross‐correlation with reshaping, global matching with probabilistic relaxation (Zhang et al, 1992, 1996). …”
Section: Time Of Consolidation and Extension (1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Leica/Helava DPW, Automated Terrain Extraction (AATE), cross‐correlation (Miller and De Venecia, 1992; Zhang and Miller, 1997); Zeiss PHODIS ST, Topo SURF (MATCH‐T), feature based; Intergraph ImageStation, MATCH‐T, feature based (Krzystek, 1995); PCI Geomatics, DEM extraction; SOCET SET, BAE Systems digital DTM generation; and VirtuoZo, cross‐correlation with reshaping, global matching with probabilistic relaxation (Zhang et al, 1992, 1996). …”
Section: Time Of Consolidation and Extension (1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope analysis is also performed with (unreleased) software that reads ISIS image files. Our commercial digital photogrammetric workstation running SOCET SET (® BAE Systems) software [ Miller and Walker , 1993; 1995; Zhang and Miller , 1997] is used for “3‐D” processing steps such as control of the images and automatic extraction and manual editing of DTMs. SOCET SET includes a pushbroom scanner sensor model that is physically rigorous but “generic” enough (in the sense of allowing instrument parameters such as focal length and detector size to be specified in the image labels) to describe most MOC‐NA (and WA) images.…”
Section: Landing Site Selection and Moc Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in bland areas were improved considerably by applying a difference‐of‐Gaussians (DOG) band‐pass filter [ Vosselman et al , 2004] to the images, followed by a contrast enhancement, for the final passes of the multiresolution, multipass matching strategy. The standard strategy for “adaptive” ATE [ Zhang and Miller , 1997] performs eight matching passes, beginning with images reduced in resolution by averaging of blocks of 32 × 32 pixels and ending with 2 × 2 averaged images. This strategy was applied to produce a DTM with 2‐m grid spacing based on the full resolution, unfiltered images.…”
Section: Hirisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATE uses an "inference engine" which adaptively generates image-matching parameters depending on facts such as terrain type, signal power, flying height or X and Y parallax. A user-given post spacing distance is used to control image correlation spacing (e.g., 2 m); hence, cross-correlation is not calculated for every image pixel (Zhang and Miller, 1997). We use the green, red and near-infrared bands of the sensor as input.…”
Section: Generation Of Summer and Winter Digital Surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%