2020
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.474.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<strong>Typification and nomenclatural clarifications of <em>Mesembryanthemum purpurocroceum</em> and <em>M. insititium</em> (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae)</strong>

Abstract: The typification of the names Mesembryanthemum purpurocroceum and M. insititium are discussed. A neotype (illustration by Duncanson) and a lectotype (a specimen at B in Willdenow’s Herbarium) are designated. Epitypes (deposited at BOL) are also selected for both names. Nomenclatural issues about the specific epithet “purpurocroceum” are discussed. The two names are accepted here in Malephora as heterotypic synonyms, with M. purpurocroceum having nomenclatural priority.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found two sheets corresponding to original materials of S. revolutifolium at Willdenow's herbarium (B-W). The B-W specimens are considered as part of the original material of S. revoluti folium, published by Willdenow in his Enumeratio plan tarum, partly on the basis of the statements of the "Praefatio" (Willdenow 1809: V) (see e.g., Jocou et al 2020a). However, this is only a guide, indicating that Willdenow saw at least one specimen from his herbarium, but not necessarily any particular specimen extant in B-W.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have found two sheets corresponding to original materials of S. revolutifolium at Willdenow's herbarium (B-W). The B-W specimens are considered as part of the original material of S. revoluti folium, published by Willdenow in his Enumeratio plan tarum, partly on the basis of the statements of the "Praefatio" (Willdenow 1809: V) (see e.g., Jocou et al 2020a). However, this is only a guide, indicating that Willdenow saw at least one specimen from his herbarium, but not necessarily any particular specimen extant in B-W.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is only a guide, indicating that Willdenow saw at least one specimen from his herbarium, but not necessarily any particular specimen extant in B-W. Since the sheets of the specimens shows handwriting by Willdenow, there is no reason to doubt that these specimens are original material for the name as reported by various authors (e.g., Iamonico 2020, Jocou et al 2020a). Since Willdenow (1809) did not indicate the holotype and the existence of two sheets, theses specimens are syntypes and a lectotypification is necessary (Arts.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation