<p>Publication Component of the UK Foundation Programme Application: Perception of Medical Students</p>

Abstract

Introduction: The 2-year UK foundation programme (FP) application is based on a scoring system and final year medical students are ranked and allocated to their preferred choice of region to work and train in based on their scores following graduation. Points are allocated to academic components including publications. We aim to evaluate UK medical students' perception of the publication component of the application. Methods: A 15-item online survey based on students' perception of the publication component of the FP application was distributed to final year medical students from all UK medical schools. Opinions were sought via a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 155 final year medical students from 9 medical schools completed the survey (response rate 155/1926, 8.05%). In the survey, 69.7% of students felt under pressure to achieve PubMed-indexed (PMI) publications, 7.1% were not aware that the FP application included points for PMI publications and 72.9% had no publications at the time of application. The main reasons for publishing were for the FP application (81.3% agreed) and to increase competitiveness for future specialty training (85.0% agreed). In contrast, 27.1% agreed that they were motivated to publish due to disseminating knowledge; 22.6% and 25.8% agreed that their medical school did not provide adequate training or opportunities for them to achieve PMI publications, respectively. Conclusion: The majority of students felt under pressure to publish with their primary motivation cited as enhancing their FP application. Overall training and opportunities to publish appear to be inadequate amongst the cohort studied. Medical schools should consider providing academic training and opportunities early to highlight the importance and rationale behind research/audits, minimise pressure and optimise research outputs in preparation for FP application.

‘Attorneys of the poor’: Training physicians to tackle health inequalities

“…Research experiences, publications and positions of responsibility (the criteria upon which postgraduate selection hang) are more challenging to achieve for those whose financial position precludes an intercalated degree or requires additional employment. 41 Doctors are not equally distributed throughout the UK, with some regions 'under-doctored' per head of population. Unfortunately, the distribution of medical schools and doctors in training mirrors this disparity, further entrenching these regional inequalities.…”

Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student Attitudes to Research and Training pathways (SMART) in the UK: study protocol

“…Furthermore, recent changes to the centralised application system have meant that research publications and additional degrees are no longer granted points as of 2023, 12 13 despite such points having been shown to be one of the primary motivating factors for medical student involvement in research. 14 15 This change has proved controversial 13 15 and several authors have raised concerns that fewer medical students will now become involved with research.…”