<p>Prescription and Non-Prescription Drug Classification Systems Across Countries: Lessons Learned for Thailand</p>

Abstract

The drug classification system, as prescription or non-prescription drug category, has been utilized as a regulatory strategy to ensure patient safety. In Thailand, the same system has been used for decades, though the drug classification criteria were updated to accommodate drug re-classification in 2016. These new criteria, however, have not been applied retroactively. Inconsistency in drug classification has been observed leading to concerns regarding the drug classification system. This has prompted the need for a review of the drug classification system in Thailand. This study aims to explore Thailand and other selected countries' regulatory management regarding the drug classification system, drug classification criteria, and drug classification itself. Methods: The drug classification systems of the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Canada were selected to study alongside Thailand's system. The regulatory review was conducted through each country's drug regulatory agency website and available published research. Complementary interviews with drug regulatory authorities were conducted when written documentation was unclear and had limited access. Fifty-two common drugs were selected to compare their actual classifications across the different countries. Results: All selected countries classified drugs into two major groups: prescription drugs and non-prescription drugs. The studied countries further sub-classified non-prescription drugs into 1-4 categories. Principles of drug classification criteria among countries are similar; they comprised of three themes: disease characteristics, drug safety profile, and other drug characteristics. Actual drug classification of antibiotics, dyslipidemia treatments, and hypertension treatments in Thailand are notedly different from other countries. Furthermore, 77.4% of drugs studied in Thailand fall into the behind-the-counter (dangerous) drug category, which varied from antihistamines to antibiotics, dyslipidemia treatments, and vaccines. Conclusion: Thailand's drug classification criteria are comparable with other nations; however, there is a need to review drug classification statuses as many drugs have been classified into improper drug categories.

The scenario of self-medication practices during the covid-19 pandemic; a systematic review

“…Even though the studies were conducted in ten nations, there is a noticeable dearth of research in other regions, such as North America, Oceania, and North Africa. Self-medication trends are predicted to be influenced by differences in drug advertising, legislation, and the ability to obtain some medications without a prescription between countries [ 50 , 51 ]. Furthermore, twelve of the fourteen research that was considered took place in low to middle-income countries.…”

Regulatory, safety and economic considerations of over-the-counter medicines in the Indian population

“…Table 3 represents examples of a few common drugs in eight countries with different classifications [ 56 ]. The table shows the examples of drugs that had a wide range of drug classifications, such as prescription, behind-the-counter (BTC), Open-shelf medicines (OPS), and general sale medicine (GSL) drug categories.…”

Self-medication's knowledge and practice in adults attending pharmacies in Tripoli, Libya

“…It is becoming an increasingly important area as a feature of the lay health system. Because of the reclassification of certain drugs, the general public can now purchase preparations that were previously only available on prescription [2] . It encourages patients' independence in making decisions about minor illness management, thereby promoting empowerment [3] .…”