<p>Optimization of Electronically Monitored Non-Adherence in Highly Adherent Renal Transplant Recipients by Reducing the Dosing Frequency – A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study</p>

Abstract

Background: Non-adherence (NA) after renal transplantation poses a major risk for allograft rejection, graft loss, and patient mortality. Yet, there is still ambiguity about its etiology and its possible relationships with patient-related factors. In order to prevent poor outcomes after transplantation, it is crucial to gain a more refined understanding of potential determinants, to identify patients at risk, and to intervene accordingly. The objective of this study was to assess potential risk factors of NA by prospectively applying electronic monitoring. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center prospective observational study. Prior to study initiation, sociodemographic, biomedical, and psychosocial variables (depression, healthrelated quality of life, self-efficacy, social support, attachment, experiences and attitudes towards immunosuppressive medication, emotional responses after organ transplantation, satisfaction with information about immunosuppressive medication, and perceptions and beliefs about medications) were assessed. Thereafter, immunosuppressive adherence behavior was measured prospectively via electronic monitoring (EM, VAICA©) during a 3-month period to receive the percentage frequency of Taking and Timing Adherence (±2h, ±30min) for each patient. Focus of this study was the phase of medication implementation. Results: A total of 78 patients participated in our study (mean age 55.28, 56% male). We found rates of 99.39% for Taking Adherence, 98.34% for Timing Adherence ±2h, and 93.34% for Timing Adherence ±30min, respectively. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the type of medication could significantly predict Taking Adherence. Patients receiving Advagraf© (once daily) depicted better Taking Adherence than patients receiving Prograf© (twice daily) (p=0.04). No associations were found for Timing Adherence (±2h, ±30min). Sociodemographic, biomedical, or psychosocial variables were not found to be associated with adherence behavior. Discussion: In highly adherent populations, only a few factors can be altered to improve adherence. Changing the immunosuppressive regimen from twice-daily to once-daily could be an option for optimizing adherence. However, risk factors for NA could be different in a less adherent population.

Adoption of a novel smart mobile‐health application technology to track chronic immunosuppression adherence in solid organ transplantation: Results of a prospective, observational, multicentre, pilot study

“…Self‐reporting methods through specific questionnaires may be useful to detect poor adherent patients, but they have shown no influence on a 1 year's adherence degree 18 . Electronic pills monitoring devices may not be considered a friendly approach since they require regular visits to download data, and moreover, their size and cost may further limit their use 28–30 31 .…”

Pragmatic solutions to enhance self-management skills in solid organ transplant patients: systematic review and thematic analysis

“…In another study, an interactive voice response system was developed to enhance self-management behaviors in kidney transplant recipients [40]. In six studies, researchers developed web-based portals to enhance patient care and symptom monitoring via electronic questionnaires and forms [41][42][43][44][45][46]. In this category, programs exchange patient information with healthcare providers periodically or in real-time.…”