2014
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3779.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p><strong>Comments on "The phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic Asteroidea </strong><strong>(Neoasteroidea, Echinodermata)" by A.S. Gale and perspectives </strong><strong>on the systematics of the Asteroidea</strong></p>

Abstract: A new, morphologically based classification of extant asteroids with comments on select fossils was published by A.S. Gale. Research approaches used limited sampling, and much literature treatment is not accurate and therefore misleading. We review these concerns, seeking to clarify argumentation on differing interpretations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of the Forcipulatacea relative to other asteroids in Fig. 5 disagreed with the topology of Gale (2011) who embedded the forcipulates among other valvatidans within his "Tripedicellaria" clade, a relationship which has never been observed in prior literature (Blake and Mah, 2014).…”
Section: Gv Linchangco Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The position of the Forcipulatacea relative to other asteroids in Fig. 5 disagreed with the topology of Gale (2011) who embedded the forcipulates among other valvatidans within his "Tripedicellaria" clade, a relationship which has never been observed in prior literature (Blake and Mah, 2014).…”
Section: Gv Linchangco Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…If allowance is made for the position of the Velatida, the tree topology in Fig. 5 is nearly identical to that of Blake (1987), who has consistently argued for a latediverging Paxillosida (e.g., Blake and Mah, 2014). Our results are similar to those of Mah and Foltz (2011b); however, their tree did not survey echinasterids, nor did they employ outgroup rooting (see Fig.…”
Section: The Paxillosida and Notomyotidasupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of marginal rows in the Zoroasteridae is still debated in the literature, with authors either describing only one row (Blake, 1987;Blake & Elliott, 2003;Mah, 2007;Mah & Blake, 2012;Blake & Mah, 2014) or two rows (Fisher, 1928;Downey, 1970;Gale, 2011). Blake (1978Blake ( , 1987, Blake & Elliott (2003), and Blake & Hagdorn (2003) discussed criteria for recognition of the marginal series.…”
Section: Ontogeny and Recognition Of Homologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results clearly show that only one row of ossicles (in addition to the carinals) arises next to the terminal (Figs 3LM and 4), and is morphologially differentiated. In the literature, when only one row of marginals is recognized, it is interpreted as being inferomarginals (Blake & Elliott, 2003;Blake & Hagdorn, 2003;Mah, 2007;Mah & Blake, 2012;Blake & Mah, 2014;Villier et al 2018). Gale (2011) introduced the forcipulatid plating rule (FPR), which describes the fairly consistent plating arrangement of the Forcipulatida.…”
Section: Ontogeny and Recognition Of Homologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%