2020
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s257200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Identification and Clinical Validation of 4-lncRNA Signature for Predicting Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</p>

Abstract: Background: The prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is still poor due to the lack of effective prognostic biomarkers. lncRNA is an important survival prognostic indicator and has important biological functions in tumorigenesis. Methods: RNA-seq was re-annotated, and comprehensive clinical information was obtained from the GEO database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to construct the lncRNA prognosis signature. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next compared the predictive performances of our prognostic model and two lncRNAs signatures previously developed based on the same TCGA-HNSC cohort. Jiang et al (2021) , and Ji and Xue (2020) generated signatures based on three and four novel lncRNAs, respectively. As depicted in Figure 7B , the AUC for the 1-year survival rate of our genomic instability-associated lncRNA prognostic model was 0.656, which was significantly higher than Jiang’s LncSig (AUC = 0.639) and Ji’s LncSig (AUC = 0.572).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next compared the predictive performances of our prognostic model and two lncRNAs signatures previously developed based on the same TCGA-HNSC cohort. Jiang et al (2021) , and Ji and Xue (2020) generated signatures based on three and four novel lncRNAs, respectively. As depicted in Figure 7B , the AUC for the 1-year survival rate of our genomic instability-associated lncRNA prognostic model was 0.656, which was significantly higher than Jiang’s LncSig (AUC = 0.639) and Ji’s LncSig (AUC = 0.572).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive performance of the machine learning models was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. The “RMS” package was used to create the nomogram ( 19 ). All statistical analyses of this study were performed using R 3.5.1 and Python 3.5.6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific gene mutation information is confirmed by performing genetic testing on tumor tissue samples obtained by surgical resection or biopsy by an experienced physician. The mutation sites of four exons (exon [18][19][20][21] in the coding region of the EGFR gene were detected by real-time PCR. If any exon mutation was identified, the tumor was classified as EGFR-MT, otherwise considered as EGFR-WT.…”
Section: Egfr Mutation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the in-depth advance of high-throughput sequencing technologies, an emerging number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been identified over recent decades (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). LncRNA is a novel type of non-coding RNA molecules with over 200 bp (6,7), accounting for the largest proportion of non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LncRNA forkhead box D3 antisense 1 (FOXD3-AS1), an antisense transcript of the proteincoding gene FOXD3, is a recently discovered lncRNA located in chromosome 1p31. 3. Growing evidence reports that FOXD3-AS1 is abnormally expressed in many disease types and its expression seems to be closely associated with significant clinical features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%