2019
DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s201759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Health care professionals dealing with hemophilia: insights from the international qualitative study of the HERO initiative</p>

Abstract: Background: Assessing the viewpoints of health care professionals concerning their work with chronic patients is a relatively new research topic, widely overlooked in the literature. However, understanding their subjective work experience is highly relevant for identifying problems and perceived resources, enhancing health service organisation, improving relationships or communication with patients, and maintaining well-being. Purpose and method: Qualitative data from the “Ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants provided demographic and clinical information, including hemophilia B severity, treatment methods, self-reported illnesses, and employment status. The psychosocial question battery was based largely on those developed for the HERO study by an international expert panel, informed initially by a literature review13 and qualitative interactive survey14,15 that resulted in the 10 country qualitative survey instruments 8. Additional clarifying questions were added based upon issues raised by expert panel and authors (eg, impact of prior relationships and disclosure)16 and feedback from global and regional HERO summit 17.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants provided demographic and clinical information, including hemophilia B severity, treatment methods, self-reported illnesses, and employment status. The psychosocial question battery was based largely on those developed for the HERO study by an international expert panel, informed initially by a literature review13 and qualitative interactive survey14,15 that resulted in the 10 country qualitative survey instruments 8. Additional clarifying questions were added based upon issues raised by expert panel and authors (eg, impact of prior relationships and disclosure)16 and feedback from global and regional HERO summit 17.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of haemophilia is evolving and changed the role of external stakeholders [ 36 ]. As a result of progress in disease management, healthcare professionals who are not haemophilia specialists are more likely to encounter people with haemophilia [ 37 ]. Nurses, for example, are the first point of contact for people with haemophilia and provide more care to patients and their families than any other specialist on the team [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuity of care over time requires awareness and education of other health care providers who are not specialized in haemophilia care [ 37 ]. It is a response to the need to improve quality of life, accessibility to treatment and the performance of management for patients treated chronically over the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good experiences were made in practice. 31 Poti et al 32 suggest a peer-supported concept using summer camps held by stakeholders for the education of PwBd. There are discussions from other authors if easy-accessible online education with tailored, engaging telehealth options 33 is the preferred option for medical information of PwBd rather than a face-to-face setting as suggested by Barlow.…”
Section: Conceptual Foundations Of Nurse-led Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%