2020
DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s207980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Chlorhexidine Allergy: Current Challenges and Future Prospects</p>

Abstract: Chlorhexidine is a synthetic bisbiguanide antiseptic and was introduced in healthcare use in 1954. Allergy to chlorhexidine has been increasingly reported particularly in the perioperative and medical procedural settings. The hypersensitivity reactions range from mild cutaneous reactions to anaphylaxis or death. There are many products and medical devices containing chlorhexidine that sometimes lack standardized labeling. With the various routes of chlorhexidine exposure, accidental or recurrent reactions in c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the numerous positive features of commercial applied antiseptics for wounds, they nonetheless display specific limitations that peptides do not. The application of a common antiseptic agent, chlorhexidine, may cause accidental or recurrent inflammatory and allergic reactions [ 48 ], while the use of polihexanide may display toxic effects to keratinocytes and lead to dermatitis in patients [ 49 ], and wound irrigation with octenidine dihydrochloride may result in severe complications, such as aseptic necrosis and chronic inflammation in penetrating hand wounds [ 50 ]. No such side effects were reported as a result of the studied peptide’s activities, and, additionally, increased microbial tolerance/reduced susceptibility towards chlorhexidine [ 51 ], octenidine [ 52 ] and polihexanide [ 53 ] has already been indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the numerous positive features of commercial applied antiseptics for wounds, they nonetheless display specific limitations that peptides do not. The application of a common antiseptic agent, chlorhexidine, may cause accidental or recurrent inflammatory and allergic reactions [ 48 ], while the use of polihexanide may display toxic effects to keratinocytes and lead to dermatitis in patients [ 49 ], and wound irrigation with octenidine dihydrochloride may result in severe complications, such as aseptic necrosis and chronic inflammation in penetrating hand wounds [ 50 ]. No such side effects were reported as a result of the studied peptide’s activities, and, additionally, increased microbial tolerance/reduced susceptibility towards chlorhexidine [ 51 ], octenidine [ 52 ] and polihexanide [ 53 ] has already been indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for performing ultrasound scans) (67). Anaphylaxis (A) to chlorhexidine (a synthetic bisbiguanide antiseptic agent) has been reported particularly in the perioperative and medical procedural settings (68). Rare cases of (A) anaphylaxis have been reported also with the use of anti anaphylaxis agents such as cetirizine and chlorpheniramine (69,70).…”
Section: F O R P U B L I C a T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact delayed reactions like dermatitis can be provoked by its frequent use [35]. Moreover, chlorhexidine can cause immediate systemic reactions such as anaphylaxis [36]. Higher concentrations of chlorhexidine irritate the skin and increase the risk of sensitization [37].…”
Section: Drug and Latex Allergymentioning
confidence: 99%