2017
DOI: 10.5860/crln.78.4.9653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>Spyfall</i>: Information games and scholarly conversation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools can help librarians seeking effective ways of teaching concepts emphasized in ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy. The games described both briefly and in detail in this article, as well as Foasberg’s (2017) experience, are used to teach students higher-order information literacy skills and concepts such as scholarship as conversation, analyzing search behaviors, and information literacy as a social justice issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These tools can help librarians seeking effective ways of teaching concepts emphasized in ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy. The games described both briefly and in detail in this article, as well as Foasberg’s (2017) experience, are used to teach students higher-order information literacy skills and concepts such as scholarship as conversation, analyzing search behaviors, and information literacy as a social justice issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Resistance (Eskridge, 2009) offers a similar experience and benefits as Werewolf , with an added layer of available information via public player voting. Spyfall (Ushan, 2014) is easy to explain and offers rich metaphors for information literacy instruction, although Foasberg (2017) found student engagement lacking and gameplay can be slow for novice players. The authors have observed that while the rules of Spyfall are easy to grasp, greater experience with the game seems to be the key factor in making it compelling for instruction.…”
Section: Best Practices and Cautionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation