2017
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c17-00385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>C</i>-Homomorphinan Derivatives as Lead Compounds to Obtain Safer and More Clinically Useful Analgesics

Abstract: Buprenorphine shows strong analgesic effects on moderate to severe pain. Although buprenorphine can be used more safely than other opioid analgesics, it has room for improvement in clinical utility. Investigation of compounds structurally related to buprenorphine should be an approach to obtain novel analgesics with safer and improved profiles compared to buprenorphine. In the course of our previous studies, we observed that derivatives obtained by cyclizing C-homomorphinans were structurally related to bupren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next assessed the functional activities of the compounds 1d – m , 7a , 7k , 8a , and 8k for the DOR by [ 35 S]­GTPγS binding assays according to the previously reported methods (Table ), and we compared the results to those obtained with the parent DOR antagonists NTI, BNTX, and NTB. The E max values were calculated using the maximum response of reference compounds DPDPE and ICI-174,864 for the compounds with the positive and negative intrinsic activities, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next assessed the functional activities of the compounds 1d – m , 7a , 7k , 8a , and 8k for the DOR by [ 35 S]­GTPγS binding assays according to the previously reported methods (Table ), and we compared the results to those obtained with the parent DOR antagonists NTI, BNTX, and NTB. The E max values were calculated using the maximum response of reference compounds DPDPE and ICI-174,864 for the compounds with the positive and negative intrinsic activities, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding affinities of the synthesized compounds 9 for the opiod receptors were evaluated by competitive binding assays according to the previously reported methods [ 47 ] ( Table 1 ). Although the binding affinity of compound 9d for the DOR was low, the other tested compounds 9 bound to the DOR with strong to moderate affinities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As all the tested compounds 9 showed DOR selectivities, we evaluated the functional activities of 9 for the DOR by [ 35 S]GTPγS binding assays according to the previously reported methods [ 47 ] ( Table 1 ). Compounds 9a , 9b , 9f , and 9g showed inverse agonist activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding affinities of the prepared compounds 3a – e , 9b , 9c , 12b , and 12c for the opioid receptors were assessed by competitive binding tests according to the previously reported methods, , and we compared the results of the DOR inverse agonists (ICI-174,864, SYK-165, -619, -656, and -657) (Table ). All the tested compounds showed the highest binding affinities for the DOR among the three opioid receptor types and the low or almost no binding affinities were observed for the MOR and KOR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next evaluated the functional activities of the test compounds 3a – e , 9b , 9c , 12b , and 12c for the DOR by [ 35 S]­GTPγS binding assays according to the previously reported methods , (Table ). For the purpose of comparison, the results of the DOR inverse agonists (ICI-174,864, SYK-165, -619, -656, and -657) are also shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%