&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;APLICAÇÕES  DO  MULTIDIMENSIONAL  ASSESSMENT OF  INTEROCEPTIVE  AWARENESS (MAIA): REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA&lt;br /&gt; MULTIDIMENSIONAL  ASSESSMENT  OF  INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS (MAIA) APPLICATIONS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Machorrinho, Joana; Rosário, Inês Melo; Marques, Maria do Céu Mendes Pinto; Marmeleira, José

doi:10.24902/r.riase.2017.3(1).902

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Esta herramienta de autoinforme está diseñada para detectar trastornos psiquiátricos menores en la población general y den-tro de entornos comunitarios o clínicos no psiquiátricos, enfatizando la incapacidad para llevar a cabo funciones normales y la aparición de experiencias nuevas y angustiantes. Todos estos instrumentos están bien establecidos y son ampliamente utilizados en la investigación psicosocial relacionada con el trabajo (por ejemplo: Seidler et al, 2014;Van Der Molen et al, 2020) o (MAIA) para evaluar los efectos de las intervenciones centradas en las interacciones cuerpo-mente (Bornemann et al, 2015;Machorrinho et al, 2017;Mehling et al, 2018).…”

Section: Escalas / Medidas De Resultadosunclassified

“…Se utilizan cuatros test validados: Maslach Burnout Inventory for Human Services -MBI-HSS (Maslach et al, 1986), Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire -COPSOQ III (Burr et al, 2019), Evaluación Multidimensional de Conciencia Corporal Interoceptiva -Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness -MAIA, 12 sub scales self-regulation and thrust (Mehling et al, 2012) y General Health Questionnaire -G.H.Q.-28 items (Goldberg, 1972). Todos los instrumentos están bien establecidos y son ampliamente utilizados en la investigación psicosocial relacionada con el trabajo (por ejemplo: Seidler et al, 2014;Van Der Molen et al, 2020) o (MAIA) para evaluar los efectos de las intervenciones centradas en las interacciones cuerpo-mente (Bornemann et al, 2015;Machorrinho et al, 2017;Mehling et al, 2018).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Eficacia de las Intervenciones de Terapia Psicomotriz en ansiedad y estrés laboral en el personal de salud

Mila

Ravazzani

Christiansen³

2023

rdp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El presente estudio analiza las mejoras en ansiedad y estrés laboral de un grupo de trabajadoras y trabajadores de la salud de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de la República (Uruguay). La muestra asciende a 133 personas a quienes se les aplican varios tipos de test para medir y evaluar su situación en los aspectos mencionados. La evaluación de la eficacia de las intervenciones psicomotrices terapéuticas se realiza a partir de pruebas estandarizadas y a estandarizar, para la población en cuestión. Se utilizan cuatro test validados: Maslach Burnout Inventory for Human Services - MBI-HSS (Maslach, Jackson, Leiter, Schaufeli y Schwab, 1986), Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - COPSOQ III ((Burr et al., 2019), Evaluación Multidimensional de Conciencia Corporal Interoceptiva - Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness - MAIA, 12 sub scales self-regulation and thrust (Mehling et al., 2012) y General Health Questionnaire - G.H.Q.-28 items (Goldberg, 1972). Son aplicados antes del comienzo de las intervenciones psicomotrices terapéuticas, y al finalizar el ciclo de 12 sesiones. Se desarrolla un programa de intervención psicomotriz como una herramienta eficaz para la mejora de las condiciones personales de ansiedad y estrés provocados por situaciones complejas en el ámbito laboral.

show abstract

Section: Escalas / Medidas De Resultadosunclassified

unclassified

Eficacia de las Intervenciones de Terapia Psicomotriz en ansiedad y estrés laboral en el personal de salud

Mila

Ravazzani

Christiansen³

2023

rdp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interoceptive awareness (IAw) was assessed by the Portuguese version (Machorrinho, 2017) of the original English-language MAIA (Mehling et al, 2012). The MAIA is composed of 33 items scored on a six-point Likert scale.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

No Relationships Between the Within-Subjects’ Variability of Pain Intensity Reports and Variability of Other Bodily Sensations Reports

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The subjective nature of pain assessment and its large variance negatively affect patient–health care provider communication and reduce the assay sensitivity of pain clinical trials. Given the lack of an objective gold standard measure, identifying the source (true or error) of the within-subject variability of pain reports is a challenge. By assessing the within-subjects variability of pain and taste reports, alongside with interoceptive measures, the current study is aimed to investigate if the ability to reliably report bodily sensations is a cross-modal characteristic. Patients and Methods This prospective study enrolled healthy volunteers from local universities. After consenting, subjects underwent the Focus Analgesia Selection Task (FAST), to assess within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to experimental noxious stimuli; a taste task, which similarly assesses within-subjects variability of tastes (salty and sweet) intensity reports; and the heartbeat perception task, an interoceptive task aimed to assess how accurate subjects are in monitoring and reporting their own heartbeat. In addition, all subjects completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Spearman’s correlations were used to assess relations between all measures. Results Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited. Variability of intensity reports of different modalities were independent of each other ( P > 0.05 for all correlations). The only correlation found was within modality, between variability of intensity reports of salt and sweet tastes (Spearman’s r = 0.477, P < 0.001). No correlations were found between any of the task results and questionnaire results. Conclusion Within-subjects variability of pain reports do not relate to variability of reports of other modalities or to interoceptive awareness. Further research is ongoing to investigate the clinical relevance of within-subjects’ variability of pain reports.

show abstract

<br /><br />APLICAÇÕES DO MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS (MAIA): REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA<br /> MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS (MAIA) APPLICATIONS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Eficacia de las Intervenciones de Terapia Psicomotriz en ansiedad y estrés laboral en el personal de salud

Eficacia de las Intervenciones de Terapia Psicomotriz en ansiedad y estrés laboral en el personal de salud

No Relationships Between the Within-Subjects’ Variability of Pain Intensity Reports and Variability of Other Bodily Sensations Reports

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About