2011
DOI: 10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>The role of working memory capacity in the development of L2 speech production</b><br>DOI:10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p075

Abstract: This study addresses the question of how working memory capacity and L2 speech production covary over a period of time, during learners' L2 speech development. Participants were submitted to two data collection phases, each one consisting of a working memory test (an adaptation of Daneman's 1991 speaking span test) and a speech generation task, with a twelveweek interval between the two data collections. The results show that both lower and higher span individuals experienced some increase in L2 speech product… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the more difficult the tasks given to the students are, the more complicated working memory processing is. Alptekin (2009) and Weissheimer (2011) in their research found that unlike recall tasks, recognition tasks fail to detect individual differences in working-memory storage. They further indicate that composite scores of storage and processing correlate with inferential rather than literal understanding in L2 reading when recall-based, rather than recognition-based, reading span tests are used to measure storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, the more difficult the tasks given to the students are, the more complicated working memory processing is. Alptekin (2009) and Weissheimer (2011) in their research found that unlike recall tasks, recognition tasks fail to detect individual differences in working-memory storage. They further indicate that composite scores of storage and processing correlate with inferential rather than literal understanding in L2 reading when recall-based, rather than recognition-based, reading span tests are used to measure storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%