2016
DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v38i1.27745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Data interpolation in the definition of management zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The elevation attribute was selected to define the MZs for the three areas based on the results found by several authors, such as Bazzi et al (2015), Fraisse et al 2001, Jaynes et al (2005, Peralta and Costa (2013), Schenatto et al (2016), and Schepers et al (2004), which suggest that when the area is not flat, the variable elevation frequently has a spatial association with crop yield. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The elevation attribute was selected to define the MZs for the three areas based on the results found by several authors, such as Bazzi et al (2015), Fraisse et al 2001, Jaynes et al (2005, Peralta and Costa (2013), Schenatto et al (2016), and Schepers et al (2004), which suggest that when the area is not flat, the variable elevation frequently has a spatial association with crop yield. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were then interpolated by ordinary Kriging in order to create a 5 × 5 m grid, with more attributes' details which, as shown by Schenatto et al (2016), is the best interpolation method to generate the sampling grid before the MZs generation process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10, No. 6; The altitude variation in the area and the soil penetration resistance at depth 0-0.1 m were used as the basis for the configuration of the MU's, because showed higher spatial correlation with productivity in the experimental area in the analysis performed in the agricultural years (Schenatto et al, 2016, the most recent period was also the soybean planting. Being that, the MU2 has the highest productive potential and was established in the highest region, while the MU1 is located in the lower part of the area.…”
Section: Soil Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indices available in the fclustindex function of the e1071 package were also used: fuzzy hypervolume (Fhv), xie beni (Xb), partition entropy (Pe), where the lowest value indicates the best division or most similarity among the groups, and the average partition density (Apd) and partition density (Pd) indices, where the best division corresponds to the highest value (MEYER et al, 2015). Additionally, the cluster validation index (CVI) was used, where the smallest value indicates the best division (SCHENATTO et al, 2016). (HAIR JR. et al, 2009).…”
Section: Data Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%