2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018wr022550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LSPIV Measurements of Two‐Dimensional Flow Structure in Streams Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems: 1. Accuracy Assessment Based on Comparison With Stationary Camera Platforms and In‐Stream Velocity Measurements

Abstract: Measuring two‐dimensional (2‐D) patterns of flow in rivers at high resolution over large areas is challenging using traditional velocity‐measurement methods, which provide data at specific locations or cross sections. Large‐scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) based on imagery obtained from fixed camera platforms can measure flow velocity on the surface of rivers and is generally accurate compared to near‐surface velocity measurements obtained by traditional methods. The proliferation of inexpensive small … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(155 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive field testing indicates that LSPIV‐derived surface velocities obtained from the UAS are within 1–2 cm/s of near‐surface values of streamwise velocity ( U ) and within 2–3 cm/s of near‐surface values of cross‐stream velocity ( V ) obtained from simultaneous ADV measurements (Lewis & Rhoads, ). An exception is the portion of the flow at KRCS within about 1 m of the channel banks where complex patterns of flow restricted the density of seeding material.…”
Section: Study Sites and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extensive field testing indicates that LSPIV‐derived surface velocities obtained from the UAS are within 1–2 cm/s of near‐surface values of streamwise velocity ( U ) and within 2–3 cm/s of near‐surface values of cross‐stream velocity ( V ) obtained from simultaneous ADV measurements (Lewis & Rhoads, ). An exception is the portion of the flow at KRCS within about 1 m of the channel banks where complex patterns of flow restricted the density of seeding material.…”
Section: Study Sites and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although indirect evidence from field measurements of turbulence within the mixing interface at confluences is suggestive of the existence of these modes of vortex development (Rhoads & Sukhodolov, ; Sukhodolov & Rhoads, ), direct evidence is lacking and requires visualization of turbulent structures at confluences. Recent work suggests that LSPIV has the potential to provide direct evidence of different modes of vortex development within the confluence mixing interface (Lewis & Rhoads, , ).…”
Section: Flow At Stream Confluencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, we used PIVlab [45] to perform data evaluation. PIVlab is a popular MATLAB-based software that has proven its quality in many previous studies [20,22,26,36,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. It is Open Source and can be used for free, and it is actively developed and well supported.…”
Section: Data Acquisition (Please Find Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely applied approach to data acquisition in natural flow conditions is aerial video recording with the help of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), often called drones [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The advantage of using UAS as a camera-carrying platform is their applicability in previously inaccessible locations and the possibility to record nadir videos of large regions of interest (ROI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%