1974
DOI: 10.1038/252586a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LSD as an agonist of dopamine receptors in the striatum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although LSD was originally described as an agent that blocks cerebral 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (Boakes, Bradley, Briggs & Dray, 1970) and inhibits the release of this transmitter from central neurones (Chase, Breese & Kopin, 1967), later evidence suggests that it may stimulate 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (Anden, Corrodi, Fuxe & Hokfelt, 1968;Aghajanian, 1972). Further, it has now been suggested that LSD is also a potent dopamine receptor agonist, for it causes strong contraversive turning in rats with unilateral lesions of the medial forebrain bundle (Pieri, Pieri & Haefely, 1974). However, no such effect was found in the present study, where only nigro-striatal terminals were damaged by the unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion (Pycock & Anlezark, 1975 Costall & Naylor (1974) have shown that a unilateral electrolytic lesion in the 5-hydroxytryptaminergic raphe nuclear system will result in a rat that circles in response to drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LSD was originally described as an agent that blocks cerebral 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (Boakes, Bradley, Briggs & Dray, 1970) and inhibits the release of this transmitter from central neurones (Chase, Breese & Kopin, 1967), later evidence suggests that it may stimulate 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (Anden, Corrodi, Fuxe & Hokfelt, 1968;Aghajanian, 1972). Further, it has now been suggested that LSD is also a potent dopamine receptor agonist, for it causes strong contraversive turning in rats with unilateral lesions of the medial forebrain bundle (Pieri, Pieri & Haefely, 1974). However, no such effect was found in the present study, where only nigro-striatal terminals were damaged by the unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion (Pycock & Anlezark, 1975 Costall & Naylor (1974) have shown that a unilateral electrolytic lesion in the 5-hydroxytryptaminergic raphe nuclear system will result in a rat that circles in response to drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models this has been demonstrated with regard to particular behavioral effects such as the head-twitch response, as well as drug discrimination models (Fantegrossi et al, 2004, Carbonaro et al, 2014). However, differential actions at other serotonergic, dopaminergic, and downstream glutamatergic targets are known to modulate the effects of distinct psychedelics (Moreno et al, 2011; Nichols, 2016; Pieri et al, 1974; Ray, 2010; Vollenweider et al, 1999; Vollenweider & Kometer, 2010). Animal models have not found consistent self-administration of LSD in suggesting a low addictive potential for this drug class (Fantegrossi et al 2008; Hoffmeister & Wuttke, 1975; Poling & Bryceland, 1979; Schuster & Thompson, 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSD is considered to be a central nervous system 5-HT agonist (And~n et al, 1968;Aghajanian et aL, 1972), and has been found to inhibit the estrogen + progesterone-activated lordotic behavior dosedependently (> 0.05 mg/kg) Meyerson, 1976, 1977;Sietnieks and Meyerson, 1980). Some authors have claimed that LSD also influcences dopaminergic receptors ( Grabowska et aL, 1974;Pieri et al, 1974;Da Prada et aL, 1975). However, Eliasson and Meyerson (1976) demonstrated that the predominant action of LSD on the female copulatory response is not mediated by increased dopamine activity, as the selective dopamine antagonist pimozide did not prevent the LSD-induced decrease in L.R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%