2020
DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2019.1710419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LQG/LTR Controller Design Based on Improved SFACC for the PWR Reactor Power Control System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several control design techniques, for example, state feedback assisted control (SFAC) [1]- [6], H ∞ control [7]- [10], model predictive control (MPC) [11]- [16], sliding mode control (SMC) [17]- [24], and different soft computing techniquebased controls [25]- [31] have been proposed in the last two decades to handle uncertainties and disturbances. In the earliest work, the notion of an SFAC has been suggested to boost the local stability of a conventional control by adding a state-feedback compensation [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several control design techniques, for example, state feedback assisted control (SFAC) [1]- [6], H ∞ control [7]- [10], model predictive control (MPC) [11]- [16], sliding mode control (SMC) [17]- [24], and different soft computing techniquebased controls [25]- [31] have been proposed in the last two decades to handle uncertainties and disturbances. In the earliest work, the notion of an SFAC has been suggested to boost the local stability of a conventional control by adding a state-feedback compensation [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the earliest work, the notion of an SFAC has been suggested to boost the local stability of a conventional control by adding a state-feedback compensation [1]. In the SFAC framework, the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) technique has been integrated with the loop transfer recovery (LTR) scheme to improve temperature and power control during reactor parameters variations [2]- [6]. To control reactor power with enhanced robustness as compared to the conventional LQG control, H ∞ based techniques have been suggested [7]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of research has been done on the application of robust control techniques in nuclear reactors, especially for the core power control. In the last two decades, various control design techniques such as state feedback assisted control (SFAC) [1]- [5], H ∞ control [6]- [9], model predictive control (MPC) [10]- [14], sliding mode control (SMC) [15]- [21], and soft-computing based controls [22]- [27] have been proposed to deal with disturbances and uncertainties in NPPs. Edwards et al [1] proposed the idea of SFAC to enhance the stability of the classical control loop by integrating a state-feedback compensating loop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of research has been done on the application of robust control techniques in nuclear reactors, especially for the core power control. In the last two decades, various control design techniques such as state feedback assisted control (SFAC) [1]- [5], H ∞ control [6]- [9], model predictive control (MPC) [10]- [14], sliding mode control (SMC) [15]- [21], and soft-computing based controls [22]- [27] have been proposed to deal with disturbances and uncertainties in NPPs. Edwards et al [1] proposed the idea of SFAC to enhance the stability of the classical control loop by integrating a state-feedback compensating loop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edwards et al [1] proposed the idea of SFAC to enhance the stability of the classical control loop by integrating a state-feedback compensating loop. Loop transfer recovery (LTR) technique has been combined with linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control in an SFAC framework for the improvement of reactor temperature and power controls during variation in reactor parameters [2]- [5]. H ∞ -based control schemes have been designed for reactor power control and to obtain enhanced robustness over the classical LQG control scheme [6]- [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%