2015
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2396642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LQ Nash Games With Random Entrance: An Infinite Horizon Major Player and Minor Players of Finite Horizons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1: The quantity is a symmetric matrix of signed measures and its evolution is given by (6). Furthermore, the following hold:…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1: The quantity is a symmetric matrix of signed measures and its evolution is given by (6). Furthermore, the following hold:…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that there exists a Markovian model for the uncertainty, design problems involving MJLS with continuous state space Markov chain will be obtained and will lead to less conservative stability conditions. Another example, which also motivates the current work, comes from the optimal control problems, arising in the mean field approximation of LQ games involving a large number of randomly entering players [6], where the players are considered to belong to a continuum. The first work studying the mean square stability of MJLS with finite state space Markov chain was [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar remarks hold for the interplay of existence questions between finite and infinite time analogues). Stochastic analogues pertaining in particular to random entries, and exits of the short time players is another interesting topic, see [15] for some early results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work has been reported in [14], [15], [18]. The present work is an extension of [14], where the same framework was considered with all the players playing Linear Memoryless Closed Loop strategies that satisfy the Dynamic Programming Principle whereas here we consider that the long-term player plays Open Loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, Kordonis et al [13] consider a player with infinite time horizon, called major player, and many players with finite time horizons, called minor players. The number of new players entering the game at any time is a random variable that has a distribution which depends only on the number of active players at that moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%