2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LPS challenge in healthy subjects: An investigation of neutrophil chemotaxis mechanisms involving CXCR1 and CXCR2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Representative images of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. SB656933 on neutrophil chemotaxis, highlighting the potential advantage of targeting CXCR1 in addition to CXCR2 (Aul et al, 2012). The current study similarly showed a greater effect of Sch527123, which caused greater inhibition than SB656933 at the highest concentration, and showed significant inhibitory effects at lower concentrations (i.e., 1 mM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Representative images of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. SB656933 on neutrophil chemotaxis, highlighting the potential advantage of targeting CXCR1 in addition to CXCR2 (Aul et al, 2012). The current study similarly showed a greater effect of Sch527123, which caused greater inhibition than SB656933 at the highest concentration, and showed significant inhibitory effects at lower concentrations (i.e., 1 mM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We previously compared these drugs using sputum supernatant obtained from healthy patients after inhaled LPS challenge; this model was used to simulate the mixture of cytokines present that cause neutrophilic lung disease (Aul et al, 2012). We observed a greater effect of Sch527123 compared with Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chemotaxis assay was performed using 96-well Multiscreen™ MIC plates incorporating 5 μm pore diameter polycarbonate filter membranes (Merck-Millipore, Watford-UK) based on the method of transwell diffusion [27,28]. CD14+ monocytes (1 × 10 5 cells/well) were applied to the upper plate and incubated with either anti-human CCR5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (20 μg/ml, R&D Systems) or PBS alone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrated cells in the lower plate were collected, incubated with lysis buffer containing Quant-IT PicoGreen fluorescent dsDNA binding probe (Life Technologies, Paisley-UK) and analysed using a BMG LabTech FluoStar Optima optical density plate reader. CD14+ monocyte chemotaxis was expressed as a proportion (%) of maximum CD14+ monocyte migration (CD14+ cells added directly to the wells of the lower plate) [28]. All conditions were assayed in triplicate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%