2017
DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The effects of short term exposure to cyperdicot on behavioural and haematological responses in 300 Clarias gariepinu swere investigated. The fish were randomly divided into three groups of 30 fish. Fish in first treatment group were exposed to tap water and served as control, while those in second and third groups were treated with 0.04 and 0.08 mg l-1 of Cyperdicot, respectively. The 24, 48, 72 and 96 h LC 50 values were1.462, 1.094, 1.030 and 0.800 mg l-1 , respectively. The safe level for the insecticide v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike erythrocytes, several stress factors can cause changes in the number of white blood cells, and all types of leukocytes play an essential role in the immune system (Tulgar and Celik 2015). Changes in the number of leukocytes are an excellent indicator of environmental stressors due to the immune response to toxins (Odo et al 2017). Based on the data listed in figure 3, there was an increase in white blood cells at each station, in which fish at Station 1 showed a lower increase than those in Station 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike erythrocytes, several stress factors can cause changes in the number of white blood cells, and all types of leukocytes play an essential role in the immune system (Tulgar and Celik 2015). Changes in the number of leukocytes are an excellent indicator of environmental stressors due to the immune response to toxins (Odo et al 2017). Based on the data listed in figure 3, there was an increase in white blood cells at each station, in which fish at Station 1 showed a lower increase than those in Station 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%