2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(15)30159-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LP05 : Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 3 infection: Interim analysis of a french multicenter compassionate use program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there have been several real world data studies which have given similar conclusions. [47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Earlier experience had shown that pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) based treatment regimen failed to achieve desired aims due to poor tolerability and limited efficacy in this unique patient population. Firstly, SVR rates hovered around 25% even when using a low accelerating dose Interferon regimen, 54 and not all patients could be offered treatment.…”
Section: Feasibility and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there have been several real world data studies which have given similar conclusions. [47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Earlier experience had shown that pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) based treatment regimen failed to achieve desired aims due to poor tolerability and limited efficacy in this unique patient population. Firstly, SVR rates hovered around 25% even when using a low accelerating dose Interferon regimen, 54 and not all patients could be offered treatment.…”
Section: Feasibility and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective, randomized studies investigating (PEG-)IFN-free treatment which enrolled a significant number of patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh (CP) score > 8; MELD score > 16) are scarce, and safety as well as efficacy data are only available in individual cases for patients with a MELD score > 22 (table 2) [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. In the ALLY-1 study, which enrolled patients with advanced cirrhosis and patients after liver transplantation, sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 11/12 (92%), 30/32 (94%), and 9/16 (56%) patients with CP class A, B, and C cirrhosis, respectively [42].…”
Section: Antiviral Therapy In Hcv-associated Liver Cirrhosis and Hcv mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of SOF with RBV instead of LDV/SOF with RBV is generally not recommended due to lower efficacy [11]. (Interim) analyses of the prospective phase III study ALLY-1 and compassionate use programs indicate that the use of DCV is safe in patients with advanced cirrhosis [42,44,45]. In contrast, the safety of SMV in patients with decompensated cirrhosis has not been conclusively evaluated [46,47,48,49,50,51].…”
Section: Antiviral Therapy In Hcv-associated Liver Cirrhosis and Hcv mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from European cohort studies showed that extending the treatment duration to 24 weeks in cirrhotic patients increased SVR12 rate to 88% [28]. Therefore, daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in non-cirrhotics or for 24 weeks in cirrhotics (with addition of ribavirin) is recommended.…”
Section: Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%