1998
DOI: 10.21314/jcf.1998.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LP valuation of exotic American options exploiting structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This also follows from applying to (15) and (17) the Euler-McLaurin formula lim T !1 c =T = = (1 + ), see Abramowitz and Stegun (1974). In particular, in the Gaussian case 2 we obtain that, under the appropriate measures, e Y is Normal with mean ln S 0 + m =2 and variance 2 =3, which is the result that appears in Hull (2005).…”
Section: [Insert Table (3) Here]mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also follows from applying to (15) and (17) the Euler-McLaurin formula lim T !1 c =T = = (1 + ), see Abramowitz and Stegun (1974). In particular, in the Gaussian case 2 we obtain that, under the appropriate measures, e Y is Normal with mean ln S 0 + m =2 and variance 2 =3, which is the result that appears in Hull (2005).…”
Section: [Insert Table (3) Here]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the discrete case, Clewlow and Carverhill (1990), Andreasen (2002), Dempster et al (1998), Zvan et al (1999) focus their attention on the geometric Brownian motion. Benhamou (2002) enhances the algorithm of Clewlow and Carverhill (1990) based on a Fast Fourier technique and adapt it to some non-lognormal densities, like the Student t. Their approaches, although innovative, require computationally intensive numerical methods or approximations for which no clear error bound is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then discretizing equation (3.11) along the characteristic trajectory for different timestepping schemes gives, in the case of fully implicit timestepping: 14) and for Crank-Nicolson timestepping (CN),…”
Section: Semi-lagrangian Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to consider zero dividend and continuous average in order to not complicate the situation with discontinuities, apart from the ones otherwise provided by the problem itself, even though especially the discrete averages has attracted some attention in the last few years, see for example [3,4,5]. Further, we chose to consider a fixed strike (instead of a floating) and an arithmetic average (instead of a geometric) since these are the predominant in the market according to [6].…”
Section: C218mentioning
confidence: 99%