2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2016.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lp harmonic analysis for differential-reflection operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first step is Theorem 3.3, where we prove that Ψ A,ε (λ, ·) > 0 whenever λ ∈ iR. In [4,5], these estimates are crucial tools for developing L p -Fourier analysis associated with the (A, ε)-operators (1.1). We note that Ψ A,ε reduces to the Dunkl kernel in the (A α , ε)-case [11,27]; to the Heckman kernel in the (A α,β , 0)-case [2,9,20]; and to the Cherednik kernel (or Opdam's kernel) in the (A α,β , 1)-case [1,15,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our first step is Theorem 3.3, where we prove that Ψ A,ε (λ, ·) > 0 whenever λ ∈ iR. In [4,5], these estimates are crucial tools for developing L p -Fourier analysis associated with the (A, ε)-operators (1.1). We note that Ψ A,ε reduces to the Dunkl kernel in the (A α , ε)-case [11,27]; to the Heckman kernel in the (A α,β , 0)-case [2,9,20]; and to the Cherednik kernel (or Opdam's kernel) in the (A α,β , 1)-case [1,15,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%