1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-3084(94)90164-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lp(a): an acute-phase reactant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant amounts of apo(a) mRNA were consistently detected in Several interleukin-6 (IL-6)-responsive elements have been identified in the promoter region of LPA (70), and some studies have suggested that apo(a)/Lp(a) could act as an acute phase protein (71,72)). However, opposite effects have also been reported (73,74).…”
Section: Metabolism Of Lp(a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant amounts of apo(a) mRNA were consistently detected in Several interleukin-6 (IL-6)-responsive elements have been identified in the promoter region of LPA (70), and some studies have suggested that apo(a)/Lp(a) could act as an acute phase protein (71,72)). However, opposite effects have also been reported (73,74).…”
Section: Metabolism Of Lp(a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Also, Lp(a) levels have repeatedly been linked to acute-phase responses. [7][8][9][10] On the other hand, negative acute-phase characteristics and decreases in catabolic states have also been shown to occur. 11,12 In vitro experiments show that Lp(a) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression can be positively regulated by interleukin-6 (IL-6), whereas it can be suppressed by transforming growth factor ␤1 (TGF-␤1) and tumor necrosis factor-␣ (TNF-␣), suggesting that in vivo Lp(a) levels may be dependent on the balance between stimulatory and inhibitory cytokines, 13 which could help to explain the variation of Lp(a) levels with regard to different clinical settings.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study which analysed Lp(a) at two time points (3rd and 28th days post MI) showed a 12% difference between the first and second samples and concluded that Lp(a) increases immediately post MI and return to baseline after four weeks. 8 But Andreassen et al 9 and Noma et al 10 showed that increment in Lp(a) was delayed and rose only after seven days after MI. The findings in this study, where Lp(a) concentrations were measured serially by apo(a) size insensitive method, show that unlike CRP and TC, Lp(a) does not behave like an APR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%