2009
DOI: 10.1108/10610420910989730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loyalty's influence on satisfaction in cross‐cultural settings

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of customer loyalty on the predictive relationship between the meets expectations and affective feeling state customer satisfaction constructs and customers' future (re)purchase behavior. Design/methodology/approach -New measures were developed for the attitudinal and behavioral aspects of customer loyalty, while extant measures were used for the satisfaction constructs and future (re)purchase behavior, leading to a survey that was administered to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing evidence from 130 US firms, Voss et al (2004) corroborate that national differences influence the relationship between customer feedback, SQ, and CS, whereas Jin, Park, and Kim (2008) demonstrated that cultural differences influence the links between reputation and satisfaction as well as loyalty for Korean and US internet users. Broyles (2009) identified attitudinal and behavioural loyalty as distinct constructs, which influence expectations and affective feeling states and are moderated by culture. Finally, Sharma, Chen, and Luk (2012) showed significant moderating influences of individualism and collectivism on most of the links in the service evaluation process.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Formationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Drawing evidence from 130 US firms, Voss et al (2004) corroborate that national differences influence the relationship between customer feedback, SQ, and CS, whereas Jin, Park, and Kim (2008) demonstrated that cultural differences influence the links between reputation and satisfaction as well as loyalty for Korean and US internet users. Broyles (2009) identified attitudinal and behavioural loyalty as distinct constructs, which influence expectations and affective feeling states and are moderated by culture. Finally, Sharma, Chen, and Luk (2012) showed significant moderating influences of individualism and collectivism on most of the links in the service evaluation process.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Formationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Anisimova's (2007) previously cited discussion indicates the positive ramifications of customer loyalty toward a brand by stating that such loyalty reduces a firm's cost of serving customers, reduce customers' price sensitivity, and increases their favorable word of mouth, all of which increase a firm's financial performance. The current level of understanding loyalty and its influence on customer behavior does have its limitations “… due to the ambiguous and contradictory findings that exist in literature” (Broyles, 2009, p. 415). This may, at least in part, be a result of loyalty being viewed from differing perspectives.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Byun et al ( 2007 ) divide the variable into two main elements: behavioural and attitudinal loyalty. Attitudinal loyalty focuses on the attitudes of individuals towards the company (Broyles 2009 ). Jaiswal and Niraj ( 2011 , p. 166) define it as “the cognitive basis of loyalty and isolates purchases driven by a strong attitude formed due to situational constraints”.…”
Section: Literature Review and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%