2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-0182(01)00302-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower Triassic peritidal cyclic limestone: an example of anachronistic carbonate facies from the Great Bank of Guizhou, Nanpanjiang Basin, Guizhou province, South China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sequence defines a shallowing-upward package, suggesting that the flaser-bedded packstone formed in an intertidal depositional environment. Similar flaser-bedded ribbon rocks were described from South China and interpreted as tidal-flat deposits (Lehrmann et al, 2001). However, the lack of desiccation features here suggests a deeper water setting with variable energy more similar to the ribbon rock carbonates described from the Middle Cambrian of Virginia (Koerschner and Read, 1989).…”
Section: Flaser-bedded Packstonesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This sequence defines a shallowing-upward package, suggesting that the flaser-bedded packstone formed in an intertidal depositional environment. Similar flaser-bedded ribbon rocks were described from South China and interpreted as tidal-flat deposits (Lehrmann et al, 2001). However, the lack of desiccation features here suggests a deeper water setting with variable energy more similar to the ribbon rock carbonates described from the Middle Cambrian of Virginia (Koerschner and Read, 1989).…”
Section: Flaser-bedded Packstonesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This is consistent with the absence of evidence for continental glaciation during the Early Triassic (Frakes et al 1992). Larger amplitude sea-level fluctuations have been inferred from other Lower Triassic sections (e.g., Lehrmann et al 2001). However, the Jesmond succession provides a probably better record of the contemporaneous eustatic fluctuation, for the Jesmond buildup rest on a tectonically stable and constantly, thermally subsiding midocean seamount.…”
Section: Sea-level Changesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The quiet conditions were, however, intermittently disturbed by storms, resulting in deposition of flat-pebble conglomerates at several levels of the middle and upper units, though a non-storm origin of this facies is also possible (Myrow et al 2004). Flat-pebble conglomerate is a common facies especially on CambroOrdovician carbonate platforms, but is much rarer in younger sediments (Sepkoski 1991;Kuznetzov and Suchy 1992;Friedman 1994;Wignall and Twitchett 1999) before exhibiting an ''anachronistic'' resurgence in Lower Triassic carbonate platform successions (Wignall and Twitchett 1999;Lehrmann et al 2001;Pruss et al 2005Pruss et al , 2006. The deposition of flat-pebble conglomerates on the Jesmond buildup is thought to be related to the limited infaunal bioturbation that reflects the Early Triassic stressed environmental conditions that followed the end-Permian crisis (Wignall and Twitchett 1999;Pruss et al 2005Pruss et al , 2006.…”
Section: Depositional Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above the thin packstone interval are 47 m of thinly bedded, poorly bioturbated micritic limestone. The Lower Triassic section continues with 95 m of dolomite and dolomitized ooid-bearing cryptalgal laminate overlain by 225 m of peritidal limestone cycles (5,36). Carbonate sediments continued to accumulate on the GBG through Middle Triassic time, reaching a total thickness of nearly 2 km before the platform drowned early in the Late Triassic (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%