2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower Miocene structural evolution of the central Vienna Basin (Austria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14). Hölzel et al (2008) explained this differential subsidence mainly with a paleoenvironmental effect caused by the Spannberg ridge which was uplifted at the end of the Karpatian (Hölzel et al 2010). The ridge largely restricted sedimentation in the southern part during the Early Miocene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14). Hölzel et al (2008) explained this differential subsidence mainly with a paleoenvironmental effect caused by the Spannberg ridge which was uplifted at the end of the Karpatian (Hölzel et al 2010). The ridge largely restricted sedimentation in the southern part during the Early Miocene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axis of NE-SW trending transtensional subsidence (late Karpatian). High subsidence during the late Karpatian was accelerated and further enlarged mainly by Fodor (1995), Decker (1996), Peresson and Decker (1997a, b), and Hölzel et al (2010) ▸ sinistral strike-slip duplexes and by listric faults connected to strike-slip faults. The transtensional subsidence affected most parts of the basin except the northern basement high and the Laksary horst which are considered as transpressional regime areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c) Geologic cross-section through the Vienna Basin and the adjacent Alpine Foreland Basin (revised from Beidinger and Decker, 2014). (Decker, 1996;Fodor, 1995;Hohenegger et al, 2014;Hölzel et al, 2010;Peresson and Decker, 1997a;Piller et al, 2007;Wagreich and Schmid, 2002). Horizons mapped in this study are; top of the Pre-Neogene Basement, top of the Eggenburgian-Ottnangian, top of the early Karpatian, top of the late Karpatian, top of the early Badenian, top of the late Badenian, top of the Sarmatian, and top of the Pannonian.…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neogene sedimentary succession is documented by numerous boreholes and a dense network of 2D and 3D seismic data. Various aspects of the structural and sedimentary setting of the basin have been analyzed in publications by Beidinger and Decker (2011), Brix and Schultz (1993), Čekan et al (1990), , Hölzel et al (2010), Jiříček and Seifert (1990), Kováč et al (2004), , Sauer et al (1992), Seifert (1992), Strauss et al (2006), Wagreich and Schmid (2002), Strauss et al (2006), and Wessely et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%