2005
DOI: 10.1159/000082706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower Incidence of Inguinal Hernia: Minilaparotomy Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Compared with Conventional Technique

Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of inguinal hernias after conventional and minilaparotomy (minilap) radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, we review our experience with 70 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy from April 1995 through March 2001. Of these, 35 patients had conventional RRP, and 35 patients had minilap RRP. Results: Conventional RRP and minilap RRP groups were similar in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Nomura et al experienced post-operative inguinal hernia in 6 of 35 (17.1%) patients in the conventional RRP group and in only 1 of 35 (2.9%) in the mini-laparotomy RRP group. 19 Our results, 19.2% (41 of 224) in the conventional RRP and 5.9% (7/119) in the MIES-RRP groups, were compatible with these previous observations. The high hernia-free survival rate in MIES-RRP could be attributable to less damage to the abdominal wall structures, exemplified by a shorter abdominal midline incision (5-8 cm) and thus less damage to the transversalis fascia.…”
Section: -15supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Nomura et al experienced post-operative inguinal hernia in 6 of 35 (17.1%) patients in the conventional RRP group and in only 1 of 35 (2.9%) in the mini-laparotomy RRP group. 19 Our results, 19.2% (41 of 224) in the conventional RRP and 5.9% (7/119) in the MIES-RRP groups, were compatible with these previous observations. The high hernia-free survival rate in MIES-RRP could be attributable to less damage to the abdominal wall structures, exemplified by a shorter abdominal midline incision (5-8 cm) and thus less damage to the transversalis fascia.…”
Section: -15supporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are a number of potential causative risk factors that have been hypothesized and tested. Previous abdominal surgery, 6,16 sub-clinical inguinal hernia 7,17,18 and the length of incision 16,19 are supposed to be related to post-operative inguinal hernia. Age 5,6,9,[15][16][17][18]20 and anastomic stricture 9,14,17,18,20,21 have been suggested as risk factors in some studies, but not in others.…”
Section: -15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the postoperative incidence among ORP, PLND, cystectomy, and no surgery, IH incidence was shown to be highest after ORP, followed by retroperitoneal PLND, transperitoneal cystectomy, and no surgical treatment [2,7] . Nomura et al [24] showed IH incidence decreased from 17.1% after conventional RRP to 2.9% after minilaparotomy radical prostatectomy in a small pilot study, hypothesizing based on cadaveric studies, that damage to the posterior layer of the rectus sheath disrupted the linkage between Hesselbach's ligament and falx inguinalis, weakening the IIR. We suggest a possible mechanism for IH occurrence after RARP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of inguinal hernia following radical prostatectomy ranges between 2.9 and 38.7% (Table IV) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Recent analysis of data from a Quebec Health Plan database demonstrated that the 1, 2, 5 and 10-year inguinal hernia repair rates following radical prostatectomy were 4.4%, 6.7%, 11.7% and 17.1%, respectively [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several risk factors have been reported including a history of inguinal hernia repair [2,4,6,9,11], a history of major abdominal surgery [15], preoperative subclinical inguinal hernia [8,10,16,22], advanced age [2,9,10], lower body mass index [4,10,11,13], postoperative anastomotic stricture [2,9], wound infection [6], a long lower abdominal incision [7,14,15] and type of surgical procedure [2,4,5]. However, no specific aspect of surgery has been implicated (Table III).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%