2020
DOI: 10.1177/2050312120929239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower extremity revascularization via endovascular and surgical approaches: A systematic review with emphasis on combined inflow and outflow revascularization

Abstract: This review is intended to help clinicians and patients understand the present state of peripheral artery disease, appreciate the progression and presentation of critical limb ischemia/chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and make informed decisions regarding inflow and outflow endovascular revascularization and surgical treatment options within the context of current debates in the medical community. A controlled literature search was performed to obtain research on outcomes of critical limb ischemia patients u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the best medical treatment, and a multidisciplinary team approach [11,12], revascularization is often needed to avoid a major amputation. Limb-salvage rates after infrapopliteal endovascular recanalization are reported between 65% and 98.4% after 1 year [13,14], with technical success rates varying from 70 to 100% [14][15][16][17][18]. These outcomes are not directly comparable to the results of the current study, because they pertain almost exclusively to tibial lesions as opposed to isolated or continuous TPT lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Besides the best medical treatment, and a multidisciplinary team approach [11,12], revascularization is often needed to avoid a major amputation. Limb-salvage rates after infrapopliteal endovascular recanalization are reported between 65% and 98.4% after 1 year [13,14], with technical success rates varying from 70 to 100% [14][15][16][17][18]. These outcomes are not directly comparable to the results of the current study, because they pertain almost exclusively to tibial lesions as opposed to isolated or continuous TPT lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The fundamentals of GLASS include restoration of inline flow to the ankle and foot as the anatomic goal of revascularization in CLTI, the definition of preferred TAP, and the assessment of limb-based patency. 15 Target arterial path is generally selected based on the least diseased crural artery that provides runoff to the foot. It can also be selected based on the angiosome preference vessel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision is often complex and the result of local expertise and practice, patient‐related characteristics, and anatomical considerations. In recent years, newer devices and approaches have made lesion length, lesion location, and vessel calcification less of an obstacle for successful endovascular intervention 37 . This, in combination with increased operator experience, shorter duration of hospital stay, and decreased medical expenditures, have resulted in an increased interest in endovascular approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%