1988
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.1.2967984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis: further experience with and refinements of US assessment.

Abstract: During a 1-year period, 537 compression ultrasound (CU) examinations were performed in 506 extremities of 485 patients for evaluation of possible deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Decisions regarding therapy were based on the result of this test in both outpatients and inpatients. Doppler ultrasound was also used during the last 7 months of the study, but this procedure did not alter the results obtained with CU alone. Incidental findings (eg, Baker cysts, aneurysms, and lymph nodes) were noted in 42 patients and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…US has proved to be a quick, noninvasive, repeatable, inexpensive, widely available, rapidly learned means for the diagnosis of DVT of the lower extremity. Conversely, the accuracy of US has been extensively analyzed in controlled studies with venography, establishing an overall sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 99% regarding suspected DVT [8,9,18]. In asymptomatic high-risk patients Wells et al [19] compared duplex sonography (additionally the blood flow is detected with pulsed Doppler and visualized) with venography as a screening method; the sensitivity of duplex sonography was 60% and its specificity was 98%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…US has proved to be a quick, noninvasive, repeatable, inexpensive, widely available, rapidly learned means for the diagnosis of DVT of the lower extremity. Conversely, the accuracy of US has been extensively analyzed in controlled studies with venography, establishing an overall sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 99% regarding suspected DVT [8,9,18]. In asymptomatic high-risk patients Wells et al [19] compared duplex sonography (additionally the blood flow is detected with pulsed Doppler and visualized) with venography as a screening method; the sensitivity of duplex sonography was 60% and its specificity was 98%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A noninvasive and portable alternative is real-time B-mode compression ultrasonography (US). A comparison of phlebography with duplex US has disclosed that US has an acceptable diagnostic accuracy in detecting DVT of the lower extremity [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US was generally performed with 5-MHz linear-array transducers by using compression as well as with color and duplex Doppler evaluation of the deep veins of the thigh and calf as described previously (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). The studies were performed by experienced sonographers, and all scans were reviewed by attending radiologists with special expertise in US.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure is tubular on dynamic scanning, and not compressible using the Doppler hand, as opposed to the contralateral one. The letters labeling the bone shadows (P Fibula and T Tibia) are located at the level of the veins thrombosis can be isoechoic to the surrounding tissues [23], but the Carmen maneuver can usually recognize a tubular structure, even isoechoic, beside the artery.…”
Section: Limitations Of Ultrasound Of Deep Venous Thrombosis In the Cmentioning
confidence: 99%