2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.064520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower critical fields of superconductingPrFeAsO1ysingle crystals

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31,32) This again supports that Sc 5 Ir 4 Si 10 is not a two-gap superconductor. The value of γ is roughly 0.45, reflecting the weakly one-dimensional Fermi surface, which is in consistent with the chainlike structure along the c-axis and the quasi-one-dimensional electronic band structure.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 52%
“…31,32) This again supports that Sc 5 Ir 4 Si 10 is not a two-gap superconductor. The value of γ is roughly 0.45, reflecting the weakly one-dimensional Fermi surface, which is in consistent with the chainlike structure along the c-axis and the quasi-one-dimensional electronic band structure.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 52%
“…even smaller than our first penetration field values (∼ 55 G). Note that strong bulk pinning could lead to an overestimation of H p , if measured in the center of the sample (see for instance [34]) but we checked that very similar H p values are obtained for several probe positions by placing the sample on an array of 11 miniature (10 × 10 µm 2 ) probes : as shown in the left inset of Fig.2, the field distribution clearly presents the V − shape profile characteristic of a strong bulk pinning. Even though those profiles confirm the good homogeneity of the sample, one can not exclude the presence of a strong disorder at the surface of the samples leading to a surface penetration field much larger than the bulk value.…”
Section: Hc1mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…By using a sensitive superconducting cavity resonator, we can measure both real and imaginary parts of Z s pricesely in tiny single crystals, from which we can extract the in-plane penetration depth λ ab (T ) as well as quasiparticle conductivity σ 1 (T ) that yields information on the quasiparticle dynamics. We also measure H c1 (T ) in PrFeAsO 1−y crystals by using an unambiguous method to avoid the difficulty associated with pinning [37]. We directly determine the field H p at which first flux penetration occurs from the edge of the crystal by measuring the magnetic induction just inside and outside the edge of the single crystals, with the use of a miniature Hall-sensor array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%