2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds on projective levels of complexes

Abstract: For an associative ring $R$, the projective level of a complex $F$ is the smallest number of mapping cones needed to build $F$ from projective $R$-modules. We establish lower bounds for the projective level of $F$ in terms of the vanishing of homology of $F$. We then use these bounds to derive a new version of The New Intersection Theorem for level when $R$ is a commutative Noetherian local ring.Comment: To appear in the Journal of Algebra. In this new version, the paper has been rewritten to study projectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
We investigate the relationship between the level of a bounded complex over a commutative ring with respect to the class of Gorenstein projective modules and other invariants of the complex or ring, such as projective dimension, Gorenstein projective dimension, and Krull dimension. The results build upon work done by J. Christensen [6], H. Altmann et al [1], and Avramov et al [3] for levels with respect to the class of finitely generated projective modules.
…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
We investigate the relationship between the level of a bounded complex over a commutative ring with respect to the class of Gorenstein projective modules and other invariants of the complex or ring, such as projective dimension, Gorenstein projective dimension, and Krull dimension. The results build upon work done by J. Christensen [6], H. Altmann et al [1], and Avramov et al [3] for levels with respect to the class of finitely generated projective modules.
…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this context, it is interesting to compare the level of an object with other more familiar homological invariants. For instance, the level of a finitely generated module (considered as a complex concentrated in degree zero) with respect to the ring is one more than the projective dimension of the module ( [6]; see also [1,Cor. 2.2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equality holds if R is local and x is a system of parameters; see Theorem 4.2 below. However, span K(x) − level R K(x) can be arbitrarily large; see [1,Section 3].…”
Section: Ghost Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%