1994
DOI: 10.1109/18.312190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds for the complexity of reliable Boolean circuits with noisy gates

Abstract: We prove that the reliable computation of any Boolean function with sensitivity s requires Ω(s log s) gates if the gates of the circuit fail independently with a fixed positive probability. This theorem was stated by Dobrushin and Ortyukov in 1977, but their proof was found by Pippenger, Stamoulis and Tsitsiklis to contain some errors. We save the original structure of the proof of Dobrushin and Ortyukov, correcting two points in the probabilistic argument.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, this result cannot be improved, and logarithmic redundancy is inevitable [4,8,6,7]. But this lower bound is caused by the need to encode the input with some error-correcting code and then to decode the answer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this result cannot be improved, and logarithmic redundancy is inevitable [4,8,6,7]. But this lower bound is caused by the need to encode the input with some error-correcting code and then to decode the answer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption that all gates fail independently with probability ǫ, the size and depth required for repetition-based fault tolerance has been shown to be within a constant factor of optimal for many basic functions (XOR for example) [5], [6], [7]. The derivation of these bounds highlight a shortcoming of the von Neumann model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von Neumann studied a model of random errors, where each gate has an (arbitrary) error independently with small fixed probability, and his goal was to obtain correctness (as opposed to privacy). There have been numerous follow up papers to this seminal work, including [16,53,52,27,23,36,28,22], who considered the same noise model, ultimately showing that any circuit of size σ can be encoded into a circuit of size O(σ log σ) that tolerates a fixed constant noise rate, and that any such encoding must have size Ω(σ log σ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%