2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-5332-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower-body control of humanoid robot NAO via Kinect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to introduce the function of intelligent integration into the control algorithm, we must first solve the problem of logical judgment of introducing intelligent integration. Overview of Some Intelligent Control Structures and Dedicated Algorithms DOI: http://dx.doi.org /10.5772/intechopen.91966 This condition can be determined by comparing the intelligent integration curve in Figure 21 with Figure 22 and Table 2 [16].…”
Section: Human-like Intelligent Integration Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to introduce the function of intelligent integration into the control algorithm, we must first solve the problem of logical judgment of introducing intelligent integration. Overview of Some Intelligent Control Structures and Dedicated Algorithms DOI: http://dx.doi.org /10.5772/intechopen.91966 This condition can be determined by comparing the intelligent integration curve in Figure 21 with Figure 22 and Table 2 [16].…”
Section: Human-like Intelligent Integration Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation process usually relies on either marker-based or markerless visual capture systems or dynamic capture systems to acquire human motions. In a marker-based visual capture system, markers must be placed on the demonstrators to indicate the positions of their body parts [10][11][12][13][14], whereas a markerless visual capture system can directly extract 2D or 3D information from video frames [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The imitation system presented in [21] obtained motion data using the Xsens MVN dynamic capture system (Enschede, The Netherlands), which offers high precision but is inconvenient and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, several analytical methods have been exploited [13,14,19,20,[25][26][27][28][29]. In addition to the positions of the end effectors, other information such as the positions of the joints is obtained in these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, human motion was captured and optimized off-line to adapt to the robot structure and constraints [1][2][3]. Recently, real-time imitation systems [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been developed owing to the development of three-dimensional (3D) motion-tracking equipment such as Kinect [14] and Xsens MVN [15]. However, owing to the differences in the joints of the human body and robot, there is a discussion about the motion similarity during mapping motions from humans to robots [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, owing to the differences in the joints of the human body and robot, there is a discussion about the motion similarity during mapping motions from humans to robots [16,17]. Generally, there are two definitions for motion similarity: one is the similarity between end-effector trajectories [8][9][10][11][12][13], and the other is the similarity between angular configurations [4][5][6][7]. Both definitions have been used for robot control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%