2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.06.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower and upper critical solution temperatures of binary polymeric solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our earliest understanding of polymer solution thermodynamics began with the lattice model of Flory and Huggins. While Flory–Huggins theory can capture the phase behavior quantitatively for a few select polymer–solvent combinations, the earliest versions of this theory are oversimplified due to its underlying assumptions . Thus, additional lattice models and improvements have been derived based on the original Flory–Huggins model. Other models followed, such as equation of state (EoS), quantity structure–property relationship (QSPR), , and activity coefficient models. , Many of these models require solving multiple complex equations simultaneously that are highly sensitive to the initial guess or require properties of the pure components that are either unknown or difficult to measure. In most cases, only qualitative agreement with experiments can be obtained, and each polymer–solvent system requires its own model parametrization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our earliest understanding of polymer solution thermodynamics began with the lattice model of Flory and Huggins. While Flory–Huggins theory can capture the phase behavior quantitatively for a few select polymer–solvent combinations, the earliest versions of this theory are oversimplified due to its underlying assumptions . Thus, additional lattice models and improvements have been derived based on the original Flory–Huggins model. Other models followed, such as equation of state (EoS), quantity structure–property relationship (QSPR), , and activity coefficient models. , Many of these models require solving multiple complex equations simultaneously that are highly sensitive to the initial guess or require properties of the pure components that are either unknown or difficult to measure. In most cases, only qualitative agreement with experiments can be obtained, and each polymer–solvent system requires its own model parametrization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Thus, additional lattice models and improvements have been derived based on the original Flory− Huggins model. 7−17 Other models followed, such as equation of state (EoS), 18 quantity structure−property relationship (QSPR), 19,20 and activity coefficient models. 21,22 Many of these models require solving multiple complex equations simultaneously that are highly sensitive to the initial guess or require properties of the pure components that are either unknown or difficult to measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 4, the averaged mixing energies of water and cellulose variants (see section 2) are displayed. Generally, the energy of mixing should always be negative where mixing is possible and spontaneous [37]. From Figure 4, it can be concluded that each cellulose variant shows different tendencies for aggregation and agglomeration.…”
Section: Flory-huggins Theory Combined With Molecular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the latter system, the solvent critical temperature was estimated using Kay’s rule . For pure solvents, other methods in more recent work include those based on solvent critical density and temperature, connectivity indices of the solvent and polymer, molecular descriptors and quantitative structure–activity/property relationships, artificial neural networks, and thermodynamic theories . These methods are, however, not only computationally involved, but also consider only pure solvents which are liquids at ambient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%