2014
DOI: 10.1118/1.4859335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐Z linac targets for low‐MV gold nanoparticle radiation therapy

Abstract: Low-Z (2.5 MV) GNPT is possible even after accounting for greater beam attenuation for deep-seated tumors (22 cm) and the increased skin dose. Further, it can lead to significant sparing of normal tissue while simultaneously escalating the dose in the tumor cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,18,37,[40][41][42] Our previous theoretical calculations combining Monte Carlo with the analytical microdosimetry calculation described above 13,37 predict a roughly 50%-150% increase in dose to the tumor endothelial cells, for a 6 MV standard (Cu/W) beam. Factors that affect the therapeutic efficacy include depth in tissue, 13 removal of the FFF, and the energy of the electron beam incident on the target.…”
Section: B An Analytical Calculation Methods For Endothelial Dose Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,18,37,[40][41][42] Our previous theoretical calculations combining Monte Carlo with the analytical microdosimetry calculation described above 13,37 predict a roughly 50%-150% increase in dose to the tumor endothelial cells, for a 6 MV standard (Cu/W) beam. Factors that affect the therapeutic efficacy include depth in tissue, 13 removal of the FFF, and the energy of the electron beam incident on the target.…”
Section: B An Analytical Calculation Methods For Endothelial Dose Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For convenience, we arrange the literature according to the following order: general radiation transport aspects relevant for nanoscale simulations, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] macroscopic dose enhancement in contrast agents and dose perturbation at high-Z material interfaces, radiation transport for nanoscopic dose enhancement of GNP, [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] radiobiological and clinical aspects of GNPT, [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] application of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to cellular environment, [68][69][70] modification of linear accelerator spectra to maximize dose enhancement 71 and GNPT using other than X-ray therapeutic beams (proton, electron). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New low energy target beamlines with energies down to 2.5 MV and beryllium or diamond targets can additionally increase the enhancement by additional factor of about 2. 71 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vertical line at 0.2 cm in Figure 4 represents the border of the irradiation field. The slight increase and decrease of the DER in the region outside of the field visible in Figure 4 (left) may be explained by (off-axis distant dependent) spectral changes of the incoming 100 kVp beam due to scattering (Tsiamas et al 2014). Electron emission by gold is higher for a beam with larger spectral components around 20–40 keV with consequent larger dose enhancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%