2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2019)208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low x physics as an infinite twist (G)TMD framework: unravelling the origins of saturation

Abstract: We show how the formulations of low x physics involving Wilson line operators can be fully rewritten into an infinite twist TMD or GTMD framework, respectively for inclusive and exclusive observables. This leads to a perfect match between low x physics and moderate x formulations of QCD in terms of GTMDs, TMDs, GPDs or PDFs. We derive the BFKL limit as a kinematic limit and argue that beyond the Wandzura-Wilczek approximation, 3-body and 4-body unintegrated PDFs should be taken into account even in this regime… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Azimuthal asymmetries then arise in final observables like dijet production in DIS [112][113][114]. But, although these calculations are often performed in a framework close to that of the CGC which is related with the TMD framework at small x [115], it goes beyond the standard CGC context to link with other physics like spin.…”
Section: Non-cgc Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azimuthal asymmetries then arise in final observables like dijet production in DIS [112][113][114]. But, although these calculations are often performed in a framework close to that of the CGC which is related with the TMD framework at small x [115], it goes beyond the standard CGC context to link with other physics like spin.…”
Section: Non-cgc Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, we observe significant deviations from the correlation limit at |∆| < |P | < 1.5 GeV for the gold target, and much milder deviations for the proton. This difference is explained by saturation effects: The cross sections beyond the correlation limit approximation receive genuine saturation corrections of order Q 2 s /|P | 2 and Q 2 s /Q 2 , in addition to kinematic corrections of order |∆| 2 /|P | 2 [20,21]. This observation demonstrates that inclusive dijet production in e+A collisions at a future EIC can provide direct access to gluon saturation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We further show that corrections to the correlation limit approximation also become important when |P | Q s , even when |P | > |∆| holds. These corrections, enhanced by the saturation scale Q s , probe genuine multi-gluon correlations [20,21], and are not encompassed by the resummed kinematic twists of the improved TMD framework [22] (see also [23][24][25][26][27][28] for forward dijets in dilute-dense hadronic collisions, and experimental measurements from RHIC [29,30]). Calculations of the elliptic anisotropy employing multigluon correlators deviate strongly from the correlation limit for |P | |∆|.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of this scheme as an all-order kinematic twist resummation was recently established in refs. [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%