2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1204-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low winter temperatures induce a disturbance of water relations in field olive trees

Abstract: Author contribution statement AL, OG, LT, FO and FJV designed the experiments. AL and OG carried out the fieldwork. AL, OG, LT, FO and FJV analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. Conflict of interestNone. Key MessageLow winter temperatures induce an increase in the soil-to-trunk hydraulic resistance of field-grown olive trees resulting in a significant disturbance of their water relations. AbstractA disturbance of water relations in response to chilling have long been observed in potted plants growing u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present study showed no significant interaction of temperature and soil water availability on plant Δ ( p = 0.674, Table 5 ). This result likely suggests that the disturbance of plant water relations by low temperature in the study areas is not significant as reported in previous studies ( Norisada et al, 2005 ; López-Bernal et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the present study showed no significant interaction of temperature and soil water availability on plant Δ ( p = 0.674, Table 5 ). This result likely suggests that the disturbance of plant water relations by low temperature in the study areas is not significant as reported in previous studies ( Norisada et al, 2005 ; López-Bernal et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…2; Körner, 2007;Thomas, 2011), such chilling conditions can increase water viscosity and reduce enzymatic activity, thereby inducing ), and leaf nitrogen concentration (Narea, g m -2 ) were extracted from Zhang et al (2005). Based on these sets of measurements, leaf nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE, μmol g -1 s -1 ) was calculated as Amax divided by Narea physiological water stress (Magnani and Borghetti, 1995;López-Bernal et al, 2015). We also noted significant bivariate correlations between MAT and leaf morphological traits (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, as there were not significant differences between slopes, we cannot affirm that these rootstocks have differences in the root hydraulic resistance ( R root ). In order to improve our understanding of the response of rootstocks to water stress, future studies should be able to determine the hydraulic resistances of different rootstocks through measurements of water potential gradients and transpiration ( López-Bernal et al, 2015 ). Differences in the intercept could be explained either due to still small differences in the canopy volume between rootstocks of group 2 or due to a physiological response related with an anisohydric or isohydric behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%