2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low vs Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Prospective Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We read with great interest both recent articles by Bogani et al [1,2]. We congratulate the authors on their studies and support their statement that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and safe for performance of laparoscopic hysterectomy and might even reduce pain.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We read with great interest both recent articles by Bogani et al [1,2]. We congratulate the authors on their studies and support their statement that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and safe for performance of laparoscopic hysterectomy and might even reduce pain.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For example, the beneficial effects of low-pressure procedures on liver function were demonstrated in some studies (13)(14)(15). However, some studies showed the side effects of low-pressure and standardpressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy on different organs are comparable (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of small-diameter laparoscopes and instruments is feasible with low carbon dioxide pressures, 22 thereby reducing possible complications related to pneumoperitoneum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%