1974
DOI: 10.1093/jee/67.3.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Volume Applications to Citrus Trees: Method for Evaluation of Spray Droplet Distributions2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The D max values found on the horizontal disc samplers in Plot 1 were generally high at all three canopy levels (76 to 102 urn) due to gravitational sedimentation of droplets, compared to the values found on the vertical cylindrical samplers (51 to 58 urn) ( (Roltsch et al, 1994;MacNichol, 1995) and other conventional insecticides (Carman and Jeppson, 1974;Yates et al, 1974;Spillman and Joyce, 1978;Armstrong and Yule, 1978;1989a;Barry, 1984;Sundaram, 1987). The gradation observed was due to the canopy levels (NMD, 10.7 ± 1.8 to 12.6 ± 2.7 urn; VMD, 32.8 ± 3.0 to 35.3 ± 3.0 urn) were similar to the corresponding values obtained for the discs (NMD, 10.6 ± 1.9 to 11.7 ± 2.4 urn; VMD, 31.9 ± 2.7 to 43.1 ± 3.2 urn) [ANOVA P > 0.05 (Ryan et al, 1985)].…”
Section: Droplet Density and Size Spectramentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The D max values found on the horizontal disc samplers in Plot 1 were generally high at all three canopy levels (76 to 102 urn) due to gravitational sedimentation of droplets, compared to the values found on the vertical cylindrical samplers (51 to 58 urn) ( (Roltsch et al, 1994;MacNichol, 1995) and other conventional insecticides (Carman and Jeppson, 1974;Yates et al, 1974;Spillman and Joyce, 1978;Armstrong and Yule, 1978;1989a;Barry, 1984;Sundaram, 1987). The gradation observed was due to the canopy levels (NMD, 10.7 ± 1.8 to 12.6 ± 2.7 urn; VMD, 32.8 ± 3.0 to 35.3 ± 3.0 urn) were similar to the corresponding values obtained for the discs (NMD, 10.6 ± 1.9 to 11.7 ± 2.4 urn; VMD, 31.9 ± 2.7 to 43.1 ± 3.2 urn) [ANOVA P > 0.05 (Ryan et al, 1985)].…”
Section: Droplet Density and Size Spectramentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Interactions of application variables and weather conditions. In most published spray experiments, conditions are selected to minimize effects of complicating variables such as wind (e.g., Carman and Jeppson, 1974). Use of lower spray volumes, with concomitant smaller droplets, is likely to be more adversely affected by diffi cult spray conditions than would a higher volume spray (Dibble, 1983;Fleming, 1962;Hall, 1991).…”
Section: Speed During Sprayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when trees are wet with dew or rain, spraying at 250-500 gal/acre is likely to greatly increase runoff in contrast to applications at 125 gal/acre or less (Hoffman and Salyani 1996). Where appropriate, standard air-blast orchard sprayers can be successfully adapted to provide a quality spray application at 125 gal/acre or even lower (Carman and Jeppson, 1974). These same sprayers can be quickly adjusted to make applications at higher spray volumes when necessary.…”
Section: May Be Key To Choosing Spray Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A eficácia no controle de pragas e doenças está intimamente relacionada com a uniformidade de distribuição do produto qmm1co sobre a superfície (SHARP, 1973), tamanho de gotas e grau de cobertura da pulverização (SAL Y ANI & McCOY, 1989), volume de aplicação (McCOY & SAL Y ANI, 1989) e estrutura da planta (CARMAN, 1975). Por essas razões, a planta cítrica constitui-se num dos alvos mais difíceis de serem cobertos pela pulverização devido à densa distribuição de folhas na parte externa da copa, o que dificulta a penetração das gotas para o seu interior (CARMAN & JEPPSON, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified