The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2019
DOI: 10.1111/aas.13470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐ versus high‐dose intraoperative opioids: A systematic review with meta‐analyses and trial sequential analyses

Abstract: Background Opioid‐induced hyperalgesia is a state of nociceptive sensitisation secondary to opioid administration. The objective of this meta‐analysis was to test the hypothesis that high‐dose intraoperative opioids contribute to increased post‐operative pain and hyperalgesia when compared with a low‐dose regimen in patients under general anaesthesia. Methods We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement guidelines and rated the certainty of evidence with the Grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventhly, we recognise that the risk of remifentanil administered to patients operated on under general anaesthesia might result in postoperative opioid induced hyperalgesia, although the clinical effect is debateable. 42 43 Eighthly, we did not systematically involve patients or patient unions in the construction of the trial and trial protocol, which might have improved the choice of trial outcomes. Ninthly, the pragmatic design might introduce a small difference in how each patient was treated, from the type of operation to the way in which rehabilitation at the ward was handled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventhly, we recognise that the risk of remifentanil administered to patients operated on under general anaesthesia might result in postoperative opioid induced hyperalgesia, although the clinical effect is debateable. 42 43 Eighthly, we did not systematically involve patients or patient unions in the construction of the trial and trial protocol, which might have improved the choice of trial outcomes. Ninthly, the pragmatic design might introduce a small difference in how each patient was treated, from the type of operation to the way in which rehabilitation at the ward was handled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on this subject have been heterogeneous with small sample sizes, suggesting fragile and inconsistent benefits. Recent meta-analyses have suggested limited benefits pertaining to the incidence of postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. The weaknesses and methodological limitations of these meta-analyses have been highlighted [ 3 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative use of opioids at a high dose leads to an increase in morphine use in the first two postoperative hours. Moreover, it is believed to cause an increase in pain scores between postoperative 2 and 24 hours [ 20 ]. In our study, remifentanil was used intraoperatively in the control group and fentanyl consumption at the postoperative one hour was higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%