2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5029585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low velocity impact analysis on composite structures – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At lower impact velocity (2 m/s), the internal energy is very small, which means the impact response is controlled by the impactor instead of impact velocity. 26
Figure 9.Energy conversation chart of hemp fiber composite at 2 m/s velocity.
…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At lower impact velocity (2 m/s), the internal energy is very small, which means the impact response is controlled by the impactor instead of impact velocity. 26
Figure 9.Energy conversation chart of hemp fiber composite at 2 m/s velocity.
…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower impact velocity (2 m/s), the internal energy is very small, which means the impact response is controlled by the impactor instead of impact velocity. 26 Initially, the kinetic energy of the impactor is obtained by the formula as shown in equation (1) K:E ¼ 0:5*mass of the impactor*velocity 2 (1)…”
Section: Impact Analysis Of Natural Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several non-destructive methods are available to monitor damage in composites [19]. The damage caused by low-velocity impacts can indeed be effectively retrieved employing non-destructive techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these non-metallic systems have shown benefits such as high-performance bonds, enhanced energy absorption abilities and corrosion resistance, they have displayed vulnerability towards high temperatures and susceptibility towards brittle fractures (Cantwell and Morton, 1991;Gama et al, 2001), which are less likely to occur in metals. Difficulties in machining, low heat capacity, susceptibility to high temperatures and low structural rigidity can be considered as some of the drawbacks of polymers and auxetics (Patil et al, 2018;Sadighi et al, 2012). Moreover, ceramics undergo fragmentation, delamination and delocalization at the fracture zone upon impact, as they are weak in tension (Garshin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%