2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00477-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature water-gas shift reaction over Au/CeO2 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

27
195
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
27
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Au 0 reduction and is in line with published data (T max = 375-500 K) for ceria supported Au involving a range of syntheses [21]. Hydrogen consumption during TPR 12 mol H 2 mol À1 Au À Á was eight times greater than that required for reduction to metallic gold, indicative of partial support reduction with the formation of surface oxygen vacancies [22]. STEM analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Au 0 reduction and is in line with published data (T max = 375-500 K) for ceria supported Au involving a range of syntheses [21]. Hydrogen consumption during TPR 12 mol H 2 mol À1 Au À Á was eight times greater than that required for reduction to metallic gold, indicative of partial support reduction with the formation of surface oxygen vacancies [22]. STEM analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly, this observation is in contrast to reports of Au/CeO 2 , in which Au NPs only affected the reduction surface ceria species, but not the bulk. 34,35 In the presence of Au NPs, the WO 3 species were generally more reducible than without Au NPs, as shown by the shifting of reduction events to lower temperatures. Complete reduction to W 0 was shown at temperatures below 1000 °C for Auloaded catalysts, but SiO 2 -WO 3 and WO 3 were not completely reduced up to 1000 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the active species in highly dispersed Au catalysts (ionic vs metallic, low-coordinated surface atoms vs metal/support interface) is a matter of extensive debates. Among many gold catalysts reported in the literature, those supported on the cerium oxide (CeO 2 ) often show a superior activity ( [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and references therein). It should be mentioned that the reaction mechanisms, involving cationic Au 3+ and Au + species as the most active, have been reinforced after experimental observations by Flutzani-Staphanopolus and co-workers on the Au/CeO 2 catalysts [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%