1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01322184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature properties of Samarium monopnictides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a gradual increase in the magnetic susceptibility,  with decreasing temperature down to about 28 K typical for a paramagnetic material. There is a sharp peak at 9 K [see Fig 2(b) where the data are shown in expanded scales] indicating onset of antiferromagnetic ordering, which is in good agreement with the reports of Hulliger et al [14]. These results along with the characterizations described above establish the formation of high quality and stoichiometric single crystals of SmBi.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is a gradual increase in the magnetic susceptibility,  with decreasing temperature down to about 28 K typical for a paramagnetic material. There is a sharp peak at 9 K [see Fig 2(b) where the data are shown in expanded scales] indicating onset of antiferromagnetic ordering, which is in good agreement with the reports of Hulliger et al [14]. These results along with the characterizations described above establish the formation of high quality and stoichiometric single crystals of SmBi.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A dome-shaped curve centered at about 25 K is evident in χ(T) plot akin to the observations in the Kondo insulator, SmB 6 [29]. With the decrease in temperature, χ(T) increases as expected in a paramagnetic system and shows a sharp peak at around 9 K (labelled as B) [30]. Interestingly, the experimental data reveal a second peak (labelled A) at 7 K (see the inset of the Figure 2) indicating presence of additional magnetic transition in the system.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…1 a, where the data up to 300 K is shown in the inset. The ρ(T ) data show a small hump at around 65 K, which is explained as resulting from the splitting of the crystalline electric fields [40], as well as a sharp drop of ρ(T ) at the antiferromagnetic transition at T N = 2.2 K [41]. While T N changes very little in applied magnetic fields [42], an upturn appears in ρ(T ) at low temperatures, which becomes more pronounced as the field is increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%