“…Concerning the higher losses of the sputtered SiO 2 uppercladding compared to the HD-PECVD uppercladding in the node splitting, this is the case that the sputtered SiO 2 deposition step was not optimized, especially for this layout, which might lead to some slight conformality problems, which are lower in HD-PECVD, which is optimized especially for this property. 17,18 The reason for the fact that for LPCVD Si 3 N 4 , neither cladding is taken as a node for widths of the waveguide greater than 620 nm can be accounted for by the high confinement of the TE-mode at these widths, which, due to the slightly higher refractive index of LPCVD Si 3 N 4 even increases the confinement. 13 The reason the uppercladding dominates at 350 nmwaveguide width over the undercladding might be because of the non-conformality in combination with the interaction of the mode on the interface between the waveguide and SiO 2 , where there are also air gaps.…”