2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature catalytic oxidation of toluene over nanocrystal-like Mn–Co oxides prepared by two-step hydrothermal method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the catalytic activities of typical samples for toluene oxidation are summarized in Table 2. Evidently, the catalytic activity over the α-MnO2@Co3O4 hybrid catalyst is considerably better than those previous reported for other catalysts, such as Mn10Cu1-S (T90% = 258 °C) [45], Mn-Co (1:1) (T90% = 249 °C) [46], 7.4Au/Co3O4 (T90% = 250 °C) [47], 1% Pt/Al2O3 (T90% = 258 °C) [48], 0.12Ag/Mn2O3-redn (T90% = 250 °C) [49], and Pd/Co3AlO (T90% = 230 °C) [31].…”
Section: Catalytic Activity and Stabilitycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, the catalytic activities of typical samples for toluene oxidation are summarized in Table 2. Evidently, the catalytic activity over the α-MnO2@Co3O4 hybrid catalyst is considerably better than those previous reported for other catalysts, such as Mn10Cu1-S (T90% = 258 °C) [45], Mn-Co (1:1) (T90% = 249 °C) [46], 7.4Au/Co3O4 (T90% = 250 °C) [47], 1% Pt/Al2O3 (T90% = 258 °C) [48], 0.12Ag/Mn2O3-redn (T90% = 250 °C) [49], and Pd/Co3AlO (T90% = 230 °C) [31].…”
Section: Catalytic Activity and Stabilitycontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…As shown in Figure 7, the CoCe-MA catalyst exhibited the best catalytic performance. The catalytic activity of the CoCe-MA catalyst was extensively compared with other representative catalysts used for toluene oxidation in the literature [26,[48][49][50][51][52], as displayed in Table 7. Table 7 shows that the T 90 values of most catalysts in toluene conversion were higher than that of the CoCe-MA catalyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co3O4-CeO2 catalyst, the reduction peaks become weak, while shoulder peaks can be found near 600 °C, which can be attributed to the interaction between Co and Ce [17]. For catalysts treated with formic acid, the reduction peaks become weaker, suggesting that the content of Co species decreased and is consistent with the results of ICP-AES; meanwhile, the reduction peaks move to lower temperatures, which can be attributed to the porous structures and higher surface areas, as suggested by BET.…”
Section: Temperature-programmed Reduction (Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 96%