1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.16.1577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-temperature absorption spectrum in GaAs in the presence of optical pumping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated, direct band gap, at the equilibrium lattice constant, is 1.520 eV, at the Г point. This result of 1.520 eV is in excellent agreement with the low temperature experimental value of 1.519 eV, reported by four different, experimental groups 6,[8][9][10]. Our calculated bulk modulus of 75.49 GPa also agrees with the experimental values of 75.5 and 74.7 GPa 56,58.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated, direct band gap, at the equilibrium lattice constant, is 1.520 eV, at the Г point. This result of 1.520 eV is in excellent agreement with the low temperature experimental value of 1.519 eV, reported by four different, experimental groups 6,[8][9][10]. Our calculated bulk modulus of 75.49 GPa also agrees with the experimental values of 75.5 and 74.7 GPa 56,58.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…As per the content of this table, the consensus experimental band gap, at low temperature, is 1.519 eV. [8][9][10] Numerous theoretical results have been reported for the band gap of GaAs. Our focus on the band gap stems from its importance in describing several other properties of semiconductors [AIP Advances]; in particular, a wrong bang gap precludes agreements between peaks in the calculated densities of states, dielectric functions, and optical transition energies with their experimental counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a) are degenerate at G. A 1.580 eV direct band gap at G is obtained, in good agreement with experiment (i.e. 1.519 eV) at low temperature 34,35) . Same features of the VBs are also observed in HARPES 21) except for the splitting at G, which is D 0 =0.341±0.002 eV 23,24) .…”
Section: Gaas Bulksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The symbol n in Eq. Then, the system reduces to the following integro-differential equation for density p: : a[p(Z,t),hv]dZ) , (5) where <fJ(0,t) is the energy fiux at the excited surface. The term (nlc) [iJct>(x,t)/iJt] is negligible with respect to a [p(x,t),hvl4 '(x,t) in the first equation which can be integrated analytically.…”
Section: Nonlinear Propagation: Numerical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%