2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000wr900101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low stream nitrate concentrations associated with oak forests on the Allegheny high plateau of Pennsylvania

Abstract: Abstract. Stream nitrate (NO•-) concentrations were 2.6-7.0 times lower in watersheds in which red oak (Quercus rubra) stands were present than in other forested watersheds in northwestern Pennsylvania. Also, seasonal variations in NO•-concentrations were smaller in watersheds with oak stands than in watersheds without oak stands. Stream water concentrations of calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate did not differ significantly between the two groups of watersheds. The variability in NO•-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest drained by Walker Branch is dominated by oaks and streams draining oak forests have been reported to be particularly low in nitrate (Lewis and Likens 2000;Lovett et al 2000). However, Lewis and Likens (2000) argue that the low nitrate concentrations of oak forest streams are likely due to soil physical characteristics or land use history rather than the direct effect of oaks on nitrate losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The forest drained by Walker Branch is dominated by oaks and streams draining oak forests have been reported to be particularly low in nitrate (Lewis and Likens 2000;Lovett et al 2000). However, Lewis and Likens (2000) argue that the low nitrate concentrations of oak forest streams are likely due to soil physical characteristics or land use history rather than the direct effect of oaks on nitrate losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Low resorption and high litter N of northern red oak was surprising given the high resorption efficiency of chestnut oak and the findings that streams draining watersheds dominated by oak forests generally have lower NO 3 À concentrations than streams in watersheds without oaks (Lovett et al 2000). For example, NO 3 À concentrations in watersheds dominated or codominated by northern red oak in Pennsylvania were 3-7 times less than those dominated by non-oak species (Lewis and Likens 2000). A similar pattern was observed in the Catskill Mountains of New York where streams that drained oak-dominated watersheds had the lowest NO 3 À concentrations, compared to streams that drained watersheds without oaks (Lovett et al 2000).…”
Section: Nitrogen Resorption From Foliagementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Species differences in nitrifi cation rates may be important in determining how effectively forests can either retain atmospheric N deposition or leach N into surface waters. For instance, sugar maple stands are often associated with high rates of net nitrifi cation and nitrate leaching and low N retention (Lovett and Mitchell 2004) while red oak stands often have low rates of net nitrifi cation and nitrate leaching and high N retention (Lewis andLikens 2000, Lovett et al, 2004). This study indicates that the species differences in net nitrifi cation rates are also evident in gross nitrifi cation rates and that the differences are not due to microbial NO 3 − consumption.…”
Section: Discussion Species Effects On Gross and Net Nitrogen Transfomentioning
confidence: 99%