2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Star Formation Efficiency in Typical Galaxies at z = 5–6

Abstract: Using the VLA and ALMA, we have obtained CO(2-1), [Cii], [Nii] line emission and multiple dust continuum measurements in a sample of "normal" galaxies at z = 5−6. We report the highest redshift detection of low-J CO emission from a Lyman Break Galaxy, at z ∼ 5.7. The CO line luminosity implies a massive molecular gas reservoir of (1.3 ± 0.3)(α CO /4.5 M (K km s −1 pc 2 ) −1 ) × 10 11 M , suggesting low star formation efficiency, with a gas depletion timescale of order ∼1 Gyr. This efficiency is much lower tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
8
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[C II]λ158 µm or [N II]λ205 µm) that provide insights into the gas and dust properties of galaxies (De Looze et al 2014;Pavesi et al 2019).…”
Section: The Early Growth Phase In Galaxy Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[C II]λ158 µm or [N II]λ205 µm) that provide insights into the gas and dust properties of galaxies (De Looze et al 2014;Pavesi et al 2019).…”
Section: The Early Growth Phase In Galaxy Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While local studies find a good correlation between [CII] and SFR, this relation may change at the lower metallicities of high-z galaxies. There is also evidence that [CII] is often emitted from the diffuse CNM or HII regions in addition to PDRs (Herrera-Camus et al 2017;Pineda et al 2013;Vallini et al 2015), and it also traces the difuse ionized gas; see (Pavesi et al 2016(Pavesi et al , 2019. ALPINE allows calibrating this relation by comparing [CII] derived SFR to other indicators (FIR, UV, SED) over a large range of physical properties.…”
Section: Science Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the limited resolution and sensitivity of current observations, such an analysis cannot be performed on many sources, and a clear consensus about their location relative to the KS relation is still missing (see, e.g. Pavesi et al 2019).…”
Section: Galaxy Properties At Z =mentioning
confidence: 99%